I tried the last difference on the CD
Well the remaining differences were in one track, so:
* In this one, I see no spike artifacts:
Track | CTDB Status
1 | (1049/1053) Accurately ripped
2 | (1049/1053) Accurately ripped
3 | (1048/1053) Accurately ripped
4 | (1050/1053) Accurately ripped
5 | (245/1053) Accurately ripped, or (778/1053) differs in 6 samples @03:56:27
6 | (1049/1053) Accurately ripped
7 | (1040/1053) Accurately ripped, or (6/1053) differs in 130 samples @02:34:05,02:37:14,02:40:08,02:44:35,02:45:54,04:12:41,04:15:69,05:55:31,05:56:21,05:58:32,06:02:22,
06:04:01,06:07:66,06:08:23-06:08:24,06:08:72,06:09:45-06:09:46,06:10:19,06:11:08,06:11:57,06:11:73,06:13:04,06:13:36,06:13:52,06:14:42,06:14:57-06:14:58,06:15:47,06:16:04-06:16:05,06:16:21,06:16:37,06:16:53,06:17:11,06:17:43,06:18:16,06:18:32,06:18:48-06:18:49,06:21:33-06:21:34,06:23:29,06:25:41
8 | (1047/1053) Accurately ripped
9 | (1048/1053) Accurately ripped
10 | (1045/1053) Accurately ripped
11 | (1046/1053) Accurately ripped
12 | (1035/1053) Accurately ripped, or (6/1053) differs in 1 samples @01:31:72
13 | (1024/1053) Accurately ripped
[AccurateRip ID: 001e606b-013a2eac-aa10d30d] found.
Track [ CRC | V2 ] Status
01 [8315cfaf|ac0b4c26] (200+200/1184) Accurately ripped
02 [47867f94|f61a68cb] (200+200/1187) Accurately ripped
03 [5226ca61|d4b65351] (200+200/1183) Accurately ripped
04 [4719e9bc|494184a0] (200+200/1179) Accurately ripped
05 [03bfbf7a|3db47f89] (179+158/1511) Accurately ripped
06 [5580a89d|49310d1e] (200+200/1171) Accurately ripped
07 [2e61b880|a5386ae5] (200+200/1172) Accurately ripped
08 [0f03e4f2|1cd0d62f] (200+200/1181) Accurately ripped
09 [4e088bd3|58934bac] (200+200/1178) Accurately ripped
10 [2e348ea5|8c0a3aaf] (200+200/1172) Accurately ripped
11 [d42de47d|8be60f10] (200+200/1171) Accurately ripped
12 [31b0304b|f37e78bc] (200+200/1164) Accurately ripped
13 [d72532e1|9cc8a770] (200+200/1136) Accurately ripped'
[cutting]
Track Peak [ CRC32 ] [W/O NULL]
-- 100,0 [35879A55] [C6CDF1FA]
01 56,4 [BA732B5A] [0465C5C3]
02 84,0 [D26B081B] [8750F6F4]
03 85,3 [8D8B617D] [89413F20]
04 98,3 [83B90991] [8D073175]
05 85,7 [5E80E84B] [DEB9DD79]
06 100,0 [846CD5B6] [2B2FE479]
07 89,0 [52A1D786] [FD5A6455]
08 84,8 [1F5FE3F8] [006AE727]
09 87,4 [9B1BCFA9] [BB732C66]
10 87,8 [44265A02] [6B5B48BB]
11 81,4 [9088CB85] [49C1417D]
12 90,5 [5F8A20E5] [324EF438]
13 100,0 [42FE8B0F] [9C1039E0]
* Mine is the "778" which differs in six samples in track 5. That is the one I posted, where lvqcl points out artifacts.
* The last one agrees with the top one on track 5, but has 131 samples disagreeing elsewhere: 130 in track 7 (visible spikes) and 1 in track 12 (ditto).
Could a CDTB score of 6/1053 be, uh, polluted by downloaders?