I haven't moved over to the newer version yet, still on 0.9.4.4., seeing as I'm a brand new user, I'm a little wary of upgrading immediately, although maybe this is just over cautious on my part. Am I missing much functionality staying where I am for the time being? Is it safe to do this without messing up my configuration and preferences? You can install 0.9.5 in a different directory if you want to play with itI've actually got another quick question, about artist art. Currently it's downloaded to a single folder in my music folder, but I've noticed that I've got a few thousand image files, which is going to be a bit of a pain to sort through. Ideally, I'd like each artist image to be downloaded into the album folder, as the album art currently is. This way, I'd have not only the covers but the artist images viewable in foo_uie_albumart. It might also be nice to have the label art, when available, downloaded in the same way. I'm not sure if this is possible with the current version already, or if not, if it's a possible future feature/option. Maybe it's possible to point foo_uie_albumart to that folder and pick the right images to display? The idea is that artist art is downloaded in a single directory to avoid duplication of images. You can't download it in the release directory but if more people want it I may add the option. Using the single artist art single directory, if you didn't figured it out already, you can add a source in foo_uie_albumart like this:i:\artist_art\[%discogs_artist_id%]_?.jpg replace i:\artist_art\ with the good directory. You can even have two album art panel one for album art and one for artist art. Label art is not fetchable, I may add it.