Yalac - Comparisons
Reply #166 – 2006-06-12 17:23:12
Red Hot Chili Peppers - Mother's Milk 475,939,004 bytes duration 44:57 ============================================================================ name/params Ratio EncTime/CPU% DecTime/CPU% --------------------- ------ ------------ ------------ Yalacc 0.08a -p0 64.21% 79.14x / 67% 90.00x / 55% Yalacc 0.09 -p0 64.89% 98.80x / 57% 93.05x / 56% Yalacc 0.09 -p04 64.27% 88.38x / 66% 89.54x / 56% Yalacc 0.09 -p1 64.20% 81.19x / 69% 90.85x / 56% MAC 4.01 beta2 -c1000 64.54% 63.95x / 95% 51.34x / 86% FLAC 1.1.2 --fast 69.38% 83.23x / 67% 85.15x / 54% WavPack 4.3 -f 66.44% 79.62x / 67% 84.78x / 61% OFR 4.520 --mode fast 63.64% 24.20x / 86% 34.63x / 98% --------------------- ------ ------------- ------------ Yalacc 0.08a -p1 64.00% 42.74x / 87% 87.35x / 59% Yalacc 0.09 -p2 63.95% 49.74x / 84% 85.61x / 56% MAC 4.01 beta2 -c2000 63.70% 49.25x / 97% 41.58x / 91% FLAC 1.1.2 (default) 65.89% 55.77x / 81% 83.67x / 59% WavPack 4.3 (default) 65.42% 75.01x / 78% 76.85x / 66% OFR 4.520 (default) 63.23% 17.63x / 90% 24.83x / 99% MP4ALS RM17 (default) 64.93% 29.33x / 94% 54.09x / 63% LA 0.4 normal 62.72% 6.19x / 99% 7.84x / 99% --------------------- ------ ------------- ------------ MAC 4.01 beta2 -c3000 63.57% 42.83x / 98% 37.27x / 91% MAC 4.01 beta2 -c4000 63.36% 23.74x / 99% 23.07x / 97% FLAC 1.1.2 --best 65.73% 11.87x / 99% 82.04x / 57% WavPack 4.3 -h 64.23% 50.46x / 87% 64.07x / 87% OFR 4.520 --best 63.19% 4.95x / 97% 6.58x / 99% MP4ALS RM17 -7 63.92% 1.21x / 99% 18.20x / 91% LA 0.4 high 62.64% 4.57x / 99% 5.40x / 99% Yalacc 0.08a -p2 * 63.84% 18.40x / 97% 75.44x / 64% (FC /b = OK) Yalacc 0.08a -p3 * 63.73% 7.95x / 99% 75.81x / 63% (FC /b = OK) Yalacc 0.08a -p4 * 63.70% 5.39x / 99% 76.00x / 63% (FC /b = OK) Yalacc 0.09 -p3 -c0 * 63.90% 21.68x / 96% 83.39x / 57% (FC /b = OK) Yalacc 0.09 -p3 -c1 * 63.88% 22.86x / 96% 87.04x / 61% (FC /b = OK) Yalacc 0.09 -p3 -c2 * 63.82% 22.86x / 96% 79.51x / 60% (FC /b = OK) Yalacc 0.09 -p3 * 63.79% 22.79x / 95% 74.14x / 64% (FC /b = OK) Yalacc 0.09 -p4 * 63.74% 13.10x / 99% 75.77x / 63% (FC /b = OK) Yalacc 0.09 -p5 * 63.70% 5.79x / 99% 76.00x / 62% (FC /b = OK) * Denotes modes with files compared after encoding and decoding System = A64 3000+, 512MB, Caviar 120GB, Win2K I hit a disk IO wall encoding with TURBO, but note the lower CPU usage in addition to the speed advantage over FASTEST. Over all, all the presets encode notably faster. I was disappointed that the material I used was harder to reduce than I'd hoped, so even tenths of a percent can be important here. For the next test I'll have my hard disk and RAM upgrades, we'll see if SATA 1.5Gbps does anything edit: typo fixed, added other compressors' high scores