Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: High Frequecy sampled audio get more compressed ? (Read 1974 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

High Frequecy sampled audio get more compressed ?

Hi,
Does FLAC, WavPack and other lossless audio codecs(or even lossy codecs) compresses to greater extent if its sampled at higher freq. ??
I mean, does 96KHz audio file gets compressed more than 44.1KHz audio file ??
If YES, please explain the reason.... If NO, why ?

thanks

High Frequecy sampled audio get more compressed ?

Reply #1
My vinyl 96k needle drops usually compress just as bad or worse than CD rips. The biggest problem is that most of the signal at ultrasonic frequencies is pure low level noise, which is close to impossible to compress well.