Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: [TOS #2] (Read 1918 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

[TOS #2]


All I can say after reading your response - you either willingly miscomprehended what I wrote, are unable to read, or you project.
Not worth discussing with someone who takes umbrage with what I did not criticize - the test itself - but apparently is unable to extend his understanding to what I actually criticize: the usual comments expected and then materializing denying the validity of such tests and maintaining their "golden eared" usual response to any such tests disproving their invalid beliefs.
Is it your brain tissue density or the airpressure in the area you live in or are you American?

[TOS #2]

Reply #1 –
Quote from: kraut on
Is it your brain tissue density or the airpressure in the area you live in or are you American?

Will you be calling into question the colour of his skin as well?

[TOS #2]

Reply #3 –
Quote from: greynol on
Quote from: kraut on
Is it your brain tissue density or the airpressure in the area you live in or are you American?

Will you be calling into question the colour of his skin as well?


Sorry if this post had nothing to do with accusations of racism/nationalism. My bad. Reading it out of context, at least, it appeared to.

[TOS #2]

Reply #4 –
Through equivocation you've gotten a bit closer as nationalism was the correct word.  FWIW, nationalism has no place in this forum.  In fact, people have been banned after making nationalistic slurs (no joke!).

No one accused anyone of being a racist, however.

Anyway, your apology is accepted.  An apology from someone else should be forthcoming.

PS: It's generally expected that people have actually read the article when engaging in conversation about it. 

[TOS #2]

Reply #5 –
I apologise for suggesting any racist intent on the part of the violins.