Yalac - Comparisons
Reply #77 – 2006-05-13 02:51:17
A quick comparison between the last two versions using another original un-remastered CD pressing. The GUI version of 0.06 was used to for fairness, MMX always enabled and usage of SSE is indicated.Dire Straits - Brothers in Arms 584,178,044 bytes duration 55:11 ===================================================================== name/params Ratio EncTime DecTime --------------------- ------ ------ ------ Yalac 0.05 fast 46.44% 50.97x 81.62x Yalac 0.06 fast 46.15% 68.11x 82.45x Yalac 0.05 normal 45.79% 26.95x 80.50x Yalac 0.06 normal 45.70% 32.89x 84.24x Yalac 0.05 high 45.41% 10.17x 78.02x Yalac 0.06 high 45.41% 11.34x 80.83x Yalac 0.06 high (SSE) 45.41% 11.73x 83.07x Yalac 0.05 insane 45.34% 4.10x 79.44x Yalac 0.06 insane 45.34% 4.26x 81.37x Yalac 0.06 insane (SSE) 45.34% 4.36x 80.63x I didn't notice any differences when using SSE on my machine, not sure what could cause the output file to be different I wanted to run a different comparison using the command line version but came across this:In addition to my latest specification there is a new command line switch: -cx Evaluate test ©ase x. If i will ask the testers to evaluate the effect of internal encoder parameter variations, they can switch between them via this option. For instance: Please try -c1 to -c5. Does this mean we are asked to try out -c1, -c2, -c3, -c4 and -c5 on just HIGH modes? edit: typos; System = A64 3000+ 512DDR Caviar 80GB Win2K