Until now I could ABX a difference between newTF2 vs oldTF only on one sample.
Right now I'm at the point to start to listen white noise and hear some human voices .... from hell
Yes, differences are that small.
Files
ABC/HR Version 1.1 beta 2, 18 June 2004
Testname:
1R = E:\DETODO\Audio\When The Levee Breaks\When The Levee Breaks Opus 96k old TF.wav
2L = E:\DETODO\Audio\When The Levee Breaks\When The Levee Breaks Opus 96k NEW TF2.wav
---------------------------------------
General Comments:
---------------------------------------
1R File: E:\DETODO\Audio\When The Levee Breaks\When The Levee Breaks Opus 96k old TF.wav
1R Rating: 4.0
1R Comment:
---------------------------------------
2L File: E:\DETODO\Audio\When The Levee Breaks\When The Levee Breaks Opus 96k NEW TF2.wav
2L Rating: 4.1
2L Comment:
---------------------------------------
ABX Results:
---------------------------------------
MY NOTES. ABX training log of "old TF.wav" vs "NEW TF2.wav"
---------------------------------------
1 of 1, p = 0.500
2 of 2, p = 0.250
3 of 3, p = 0.125
3 of 4, p = 0.313
4 of 5, p = 0.188
5 of 6, p = 0.109
6 of 7, p = 0.063
7 of 8, p = 0.035
TRAINING MODE -- not written to file
P.S. As for this sample I think newTF2 is just a little bit more constant on backround, less splashy (less wavy).