Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: toolame Vs lame (Read 6196 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

toolame Vs lame

I am trying to encode file at 256 kbps using toolame but the toolame output is entirely different

why ??????? 

is there any settings difference? or any DEFINES hve to be added ?

toolame Vs lame

Reply #1 –
Quote
I am trying to encode file at 256 kbps using toolame and lame.
but the toolame and lame outputs are entirely different

why ??????? 
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=334550"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Different in what sense, beyond the obvious that toolame is an mp2 encoder and lame is an mp3 encoder?

toolame Vs lame

Reply #2 –
sorry for the confusion
neglect the old posts

my question is

i tried to encode using toolame at 256 kbps.
i have output generated using ISO code.
but this toolame output and ISO output are not matching.
ISO output shud be correct. so pblm is with toolame.

is there any settings or defines have to be added to toolame to get correct output ?
or is that a pblm of toolame itself?

toolame Vs lame

Reply #3 –
The ISO encoder is an example of encoder, and in no way a standard. ISO defines decoding, not encoding.
Encoders are free to do whatever they do, as long as it can be decoded.

Otherwise having several different encoders would be quite useless, don't you think so?

toolame Vs lame

Reply #4 –
Quote
The ISO encoder is an example of encoder, and in no way a standard. ISO defines decoding, not encoding.
Encoders are free to do whatever they do, as long as it can be decoded.

Otherwise having several different encoders would be quite useless, don't you think so?
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=334558"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


thank u for ur reply

Can u tell me a good freeware decoder ( give me the link if possible) so that i can decode the output of the encoder and compare their results

toolame Vs lame

Reply #5 –
Every MP3 player should be able to decode MP2.
Examples: Foobar, WinAmp, VLC, Mediaplayer Classic etc

toolame Vs lame

Reply #6 –
Different decoders rarely produce identical output, as far as I know.

What is the purpose of your comparison?

toolame Vs lame

Reply #7 –
She wants to compare different encoders
 

toolame Vs lame

Reply #8 –
Quote
She wants to compare different encoders
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=334651"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]



exactly !! i want to compare the quality of different encoders