Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: FLAC VS OPUS @ 170 Kbps (Read 18908 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

FLAC VS OPUS @ 170 Kbps

Reply #26 –
So here is the test with framesize 60

Opus 170 kbps

foo_abx 2.0.1 report
foobar2000 v1.3.9
2015-11-22 08:16:58

File A: 01. yuiko — Awake.flac
SHA1: 35140ac2c8edc74a8681be43878c30abf6d700ec
File B: 01 - Awake.opus
SHA1: ec7ea0bd6262485c44ecda88264b42db16794a30

Used DSPs:
Resampler (dBpoweramp/SSRC)

Output:
DS : Primary Sound Driver
Crossfading: NO

08:16:58 : Test started.
08:17:39 : 01/01
08:18:24 : 02/02
08:19:05 : 02/03
08:19:28 : 03/04
08:20:07 : 04/05
08:20:47 : 05/06
08:21:22 : 05/07
08:22:01 : 06/08
08:22:35 : 07/09
08:23:13 : 08/10
08:23:51 : 09/11
08:24:29 : 10/12
08:25:04 : 11/13
08:25:58 : 11/14
08:26:39 : 12/15
08:27:16 : 13/16
08:27:56 : 14/17
08:28:35 : 14/18
08:29:15 : 14/19
08:29:55 : 15/20
08:29:55 : Test finished.

----------
Total: 15/20
Probability that you were guessing: 2.1%

-- signature --
a9a8b093a9b068ffcd0271ef0bd705500462cf00
I will think about tomorrow's problem tomorrow

FLAC VS OPUS @ 170 Kbps

Reply #27 –
Incuriousity, could you please post a link to part of the song. I want to ABX myself.

FLAC VS OPUS @ 170 Kbps

Reply #28 –
Please remember our Terms:
Quote from: CiTay on
-> 9.

Users found in violation of this rule will be subject to immediate punishment. Properly cited short music clips (no longer than necessary and under 30 seconds) for codec testing purposes are allowed.

Discussions about illegal filesharing sites/forums and ripping groups are not wanted here and can lead to a warning or worse.

FLAC VS OPUS @ 170 Kbps

Reply #29 –
Quote from: alter4 on
Incuriousity, could you please post a link to part of the song. I want to ABX myself.

Will do but do you know any software that can cut FLAC? Never use one of those so I don't know any good software
I will think about tomorrow's problem tomorrow

FLAC VS OPUS @ 170 Kbps

Reply #32 –
Quote from: Incuriousity on
So here is the test with framesize 60

Opus 170 kbps

Total: 15/20
Probability that you were guessing: 2.1%

-- signature --
a9a8b093a9b068ffcd0271ef0bd705500462cf00


So not really much. But it mostly helps in low bitrates.

Quote from: derf_ on
Quote from: rudolf.gelpke on
Are there any  visiting this forum by the way?


Some of us look in from time to time...


Oh hi. :-)

FLAC VS OPUS @ 170 Kbps

Reply #33 –
OK for some reason I cant upload it to hydrogenaudio server. I got this error

Code: [Select]
413 Request Entity Too Large

So I decide to use another file hosting. I hope this doesn't break any rule

http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_...272581245695218
I will think about tomorrow's problem tomorrow

FLAC VS OPUS @ 170 Kbps

Reply #34 –
Upload to the uploads forum and then provide link to it in the discussion.

The use of file/image hosting services that put advertising before functionality is discouraged.

FLAC VS OPUS @ 170 Kbps

Reply #35 –
Quote from: greynol on
Upload to the uploads forum and then provide link to it in the discussion.

The use of file/image hosting services that put advertising before functionality is discouraged.


I couldn't upload the file too. Google says nginx should be restarted.