DBT Is Flawed Because Bob Stuart Says So
Reply #8 –
If nobody had looked for planets outside the Solar System, nobody would have ever discovered any. That is what science is, or ought to be, all about in the first place.
How does requiring objective confirmation of claims prevent curiosity?
Meaning, differences between sounds are magnified when I listen purely for pleasure rather than for making comparisons. I know, it may seem a little bit strange perhaps, but nevertheless, it's true.
The needle on my placebo effect meter just pegged.
Funny how otherwise obvious differences vanish under scrutiny, isn't it?
ABX itself is what can severely impair one's ability to "hear something"
That this is it true is highly questionable. Next time you present a "fact" I recommend supporting it with evidence rather than anecdotes.
While there may be a limit on one's patience and/or resources which may hinder proper ABX testing, ABX testing does not require arbitrary time limits. This tired "time limit" excuse still doesn't change where the burden of proof falls when pitting theories that are corroborated with little or no evidence against theories that are corroborated with evidence or are falsifiable but have yet to be falsified.
Regarding "experts" I can find some who say global warming is not real. I don't know of any in this camp who don't also have some kind of incentive to hold this position, however. You might consider whether the same can't be said about some of these neuroscientists. Of course some kind of vested interest doesn't necessarily mean that they are wrong either. The point is that expert testimony can be cherry-picked.