.Ogg Vorbis aotuv Reply #550 – 2014-06-24 17:00:00 hi aoyumi, what exactly was changed in beta 6.03 (2014) when it's not sound quality part?
.Ogg Vorbis aotuv Reply #551 – 2014-06-24 19:06:08 Quote from: Anakunda on 2014-06-24 17:00:00hi aoyumi, what exactly was changed in beta 6.03 (2014) when it's not sound quality part?I could be wrong, but I think it's just a merge with libvorbis 1.3.4.
.Ogg Vorbis aotuv Reply #552 – 2014-06-24 19:38:00 Quote from: john33 on 2014-06-24 19:06:08I could be wrong, but I think it's just a merge with libvorbis 1.3.4.Exactly:[quote author=http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/ link=msg=0 date=]aoTuV Beta6.03 (2014) (2014/5/11) # The latest aoTuV beta6.03 was unified with Xiph.Org's libvorbis1.3.4. The part related to sound quality is not changed from previous version.[/quote]
Re: .Ogg Vorbis aotuv Reply #553 – 2016-03-27 16:49:37 is there any posibility to see any new update of Aoyumi's version of codec again? or is an abandoned project. Is there any new update from anyone anyway?I still use ogg vorbis and i was interested if there is still an action from anyone.
Re: .Ogg Vorbis aotuv Reply #554 – 2016-03-27 17:40:06 The latest aotuv is based on 1.3.5 ver of libvorbis, so it's up to date I guess.
Re: .Ogg Vorbis aotuv Reply #555 – 2016-03-30 14:25:16 but isnt an old version too? Is been some time to hear an update
Re: .Ogg Vorbis aotuv Reply #556 – 2016-03-31 17:05:19 Just look at the official vorbis site. libvorbis 1.3.5 is the newest release.Most of the optimizing efforts probably goes towards opus now anyway.
Re: .Ogg Vorbis aotuv Reply #557 – 2016-03-31 17:25:17 I think that Nicos asks about psychoacoustic model development.aoTuV Beta6 was developed 5 years ago, and there were no changes since then.
Re: .Ogg Vorbis aotuv Reply #558 – 2018-05-03 09:40:23 aoTuV Beta6.03 (2018) (2018/5/2) was released# The latest aoTuV beta6.03 was unified with Xiph.Org's libvorbis1.3.6. The part related to sound quality is not changed from previous version.http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/binary/aoTuV_b6.03_2018.7zThe obvious question is here if nowadays' Vorbis has yet whatever to offer over AAC and Opus (xcept wider support on HW players ofcourse tho even this is disputable)
Re: .Ogg Vorbis aotuv Reply #559 – 2018-05-04 16:56:27 On modes other than LC, AAC can be heavy on decoding side. On some portables and older phones can show various issues. I think vorbis, mpc, mp3 (not sure of optus) offer similar performance no matter what bitrate. This could be an advantage for vorbis - streaming audio at 64 k vs AAC HE resource wise while still offering OK quality. Otherwise like mpc, theres a reference free encoder for all bitrates . Opus I never tested. I have an older android phone and AAC 32..64k stream somtimes reduce battery drasticaly or get it running hot.
Re: .Ogg Vorbis aotuv Reply #560 – 2018-05-05 10:36:52 Quote from: shadowking on 2018-05-04 16:56:27On modes other than LC, AAC can be heavy on decoding side. On some portables and older phones can show various issues. I think vorbis, mpc, mp3 (not sure of optus) offer similar performance no matter what bitrate. This could be an advantage for vorbis - streaming audio at 64 k vs AAC HE resource wise while still offering OK quality. Otherwise like mpc, theres a reference free encoder for all bitrates . Opus I never tested. I have an older android phone and AAC 32..64k stream somtimes reduce battery drasticaly or get it running hot.From these results on the rockbox wiki, ACC-HE and AAC-HEv2 seem to require more cpu clocks to decode. On older processors it will drain the battery faster.https://www.rockbox.org/wiki/CodecPerformanceComparisonhttps://www.rockbox.org/wiki/CodecPerformanceComparison#AMS_AS3525v2_w_47_24MHz_PCLK_40ARM926EJ_45S_41 Last Edit: 2018-05-05 10:38:30 by arkhh