Replay Gain specification Reply #75 – 2011-01-11 11:41:47 Quote from: greynol on 2011-01-11 03:02:17Of course I have already objected (and still object!) to the "because that is what David did" argument regarding "preferred" ID3 tagging, so take the link with a grain of salt.I'm not following this properly, so haven't seen this, but if you're referring to the sections in the original proposed spec describing how to store the ReplayGain values, then if there's a different implementation out there that's far more common that the one I originally suggested, then obviously that common implementation is the defacto standard, and that is what is supposed to be captured in this wiki spec (IMO!).AFAICT for mp3 it's a bit of a mess (not a huge mess, but not ideal!) and the most useful thing to do might be to document the multiple approaches that are out there and what uses/supports each approach. A presumption could be that the widest supported approach(es) is/are the defacto standard, and anything with little or no support could be depreciated (even if it's what's in the original proposed standard). I doubt there can be one single standard for RG tags in mp3, since there isn't one single standard for tagging mp3.Cheers,David.