Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: WavPack 4.3b is available for testing (Read 25981 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

WavPack 4.3b is available for testing

Reply #25 –
Quote
Well, -x is usually pretty slow for me anyway.  Does the mono fix you have incorporated break decoder compatibility?
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=337904"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Yes, -x (and especially -hx) is very slow. I think there is a good chance these could be speeded up enough that people might use them more often.

On the mono enhancement, the decoder has not been broken because there is no way to use the feature yet. First, I will put the encoding feature into a beta. Later I will put it into the released code but it will require an command-line option because the resulting files will not play on pre-4.3 decoders.

This all assumes that Pioneer does not announce a new CD player that supports WavPack. In that case I won't change a thing! 

WavPack 4.3b is available for testing

Reply #26 –
Bryant, a small request: could you add exit return codes in wavpack?  For example:

0 - success
1 - mild warnings
2 - severe warnings (don't know if you have this)
3 - encoding/internal errors
4 - input format errors
5 - I/O error (file not found, output not writable etc)
6 - command line usage errors

You could of course return 0 on warnings.

Great when used in batch to check results, using errorlevel N tests.

Thanks.

WavPack 4.3b is available for testing

Reply #27 –
Quote
Bryant, a small request: could you add exit return codes in wavpack?  For example:

0 - success
1 - mild warnings
2 - severe warnings (don't know if you have this)
3 - encoding/internal errors
4 - input format errors
5 - I/O error (file not found, output not writable etc)
6 - command line usage errors

You could of course return 0 on warnings.

Great when used in batch to check results, using errorlevel N tests.

Thanks.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=338824"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Sorry about this. Until recently I actually thought I was returning valid error codes but it was pointed out to me that it was not too consistent.

This beta should be better than 4.22 and the 4.3 release will always return an error when there is one.

I had not thought about having different error codes for different types of errors, but I can see why that might be handy. I'll look into that for the future (for now I just return 0 or 1).

Thanks for the suggestion.

WavPack 4.3b is available for testing

Reply #28 –
1 for errors and 0 for success is good enough for most purposes anyways. Thanks a bunch.

WavPack 4.3b is available for testing

Reply #29 –
Quote
WavPack is a multiplatform application, but the 4.3b you shared are MS Windows only.
So I have to ask when you plan to release this version to us non-Windows users?

Or maybe you only want feedback from a limited user base?

**  waiting **
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Okay, I have finished up 4.3 and posted the *nix sources here:

[a href="http://www.wavpack.com/wavpack-4.3.tar.bz2]http://www.wavpack.com/wavpack-4.3.tar.bz2[/url]

Please let me know if there's any trouble building. I will put up everything else tomorrow (which I guess is later today for most of you...) 

WavPack 4.3b is available for testing

Reply #30 –
Quote
Okay, I have finished up 4.3 and posted the *nix sources here:

http://www.wavpack.com/wavpack-4.3.tar.bz2

Please let me know if there's any trouble building. I will put up everything else tomorrow (which I guess is later today for most of you...) 
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=339648"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

you are nothing short of amazing bryant.  thanks for the fast development, it is really encouraging.  any significant diferences from the beta?
a windows-free, linux user since 1/31/06.

WavPack 4.3b is available for testing

Reply #31 –
Quote
Quote
Okay, I have finished up 4.3 and posted the *nix sources here:

http://www.wavpack.com/wavpack-4.3.tar.bz2

Please let me know if there's any trouble building. I will put up everything else tomorrow (which I guess is later today for most of you...) 
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=339648"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

you are nothing short of amazing bryant.  thanks for the fast development, it is really encouraging.  any significant diferences from the beta?
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=339652"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Thanks! 

The only two changes of any significance were fixing Kazuma's bug for raw decoding and making sure that all error paths result in an error status being returned (after Tycho's suggestion).

Most of the work was testing and documentation... 
 

WavPack 4.3b is available for testing

Reply #32 –
Quote
Okay, I have finished up 4.3 and posted the *nix sources here:
http://www.wavpack.com/wavpack-4.3.tar.bz2

Please let me know if there's any trouble building. I will put up everything else tomorrow (which I guess is later today for most of you...) 

Excellent!
I compiled static binaries on Mac OS 10.4.3, using GCC 4.0.0 (build 5026) without any trouble. Testing remains though.

Thanks a lot!

WavPack 4.3b is available for testing

Reply #33 –
Quote
Okay, I have finished up 4.3 and posted the *nix sources here:

http://www.wavpack.com/wavpack-4.3.tar.bz2

Please let me know if there's any trouble building.[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=339648"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Sure, lots of trouble building. So much trouble, I built for these platforms:

FreeBSD-x86
NetBSD-x86
HPUX-HPPA
MacOSX-PowerPC
Linux-x86
Linux-ia64
Solaris-SPARC
Solaris-x86
Tru64Unix-Alpha



Edit: I also did quick tests on all of them (encoding lossless and hybrid, decoding lossless and hybrid, CD material)

WavPack 4.3b is available for testing

Reply #34 –
Any information for which version a command line replaygain utility is planned?

WavPack 4.3b is available for testing

Reply #35 –
The WavPack website is now updated with all the 4.3 release.

Thanks eveyone for your testing and patience! 

I have a couple weeks available this month; I may be able to put the ReplayGain scanner together soon.

WavPack 4.3b is available for testing

Reply #36 –
Is this the location?: http://www.wavpack.com/files/wavpack-4.3.zip

Because I don't see the updated page.

EDIT: Sorry, I was seeing my browser's cached page
we was young an' full of beans

WavPack 4.3b is available for testing

Reply #37 –
Awesome, thank you!