Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

If you are using a Hotmail or Outlook email address, please change it now, as Microsoft is rejecting all email from our service outright.
Topic: 320kbit: Blade vs. Lame (Read 16700 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

320kbit: Blade vs. Lame

Reply #25 –
Looking at the Frequency spectrum won't tell you a thing about quality as you cannot see problems of the psychoacustic model you might hear.

Lossy compression is always about sounding as the CD not looking as it!

320kbit: Blade vs. Lame

Reply #26 –
Quote
Looking at the Frequency spectrum won't tell you a thing about quality as you cannot see problems of the psychoacustic model you might hear.

Lossy compression is always about sounding as the CD not looking as it!
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=237801"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]



I see .... said the blind man  Roger that -
 

320kbit: Blade vs. Lame

Reply #27 –
looking at spectograms for quality determination is a usefull as playing back your jpegs as raw sound to hear the differences.
Sven Bent - Denmark
 
SimplePortal 1.0.0 RC1 © 2008-2021