Re: Transparency: Public Listening Tests vs Anecdotes and My Experiences
Reply #16 –
I posted a sample before here where Vorbis needs Q9.5 on merzbow. There old samples i made for AAC that suck at 144k but don't respond to 320k, Why should i care if your not even going to reply back when i spent 30mins wasting time making 30 sec samples with the same fucking replies?.
Yeah, right. As if this was a social media platform and we were your followers, to be aware of your previous posts! If you want to be taken seriously here, and not just as another crackpot who happens to be fiercely defending his favourite codec, have at least the decency of referring to your onw posts and not expecting us to be able to quote you by heart!
Not replying back!? What the heck you're talking about?
Is this bait are you that self unaware on how this place just reeks of AAC fanboyism
Man, you're definitely seeing things! What bait? That was just a reminder that, by now, you should've known better to keep an eye on the ball whenever making such apparently-unsuported claims over here - you even seemed to have taken that with a light heart at first, till I only complemented what someone else said and you started shit-throwing and using innuendos - which didn't make your claims any favour, as they came out rather hollow - and from what I learned hanging out here since 2001, such statement are actually a blatant tell-tale sign of said fanboyism - and TBH, these "mine is better than yours" statements are soo 2002, 2003, BTW!
I was going to make a thread about my views on multi codecs but might do it else where.
With that 'hollier-than-thou' attitude, you talk as if your chosing not to "enlighten us with your wisdom" would be a massive blow to this community!