lame --abr 20 -m j -q 0 --resample 22.05 --priority 4lame --abr 16 -m j -q 0 --resample 11.025 --priority 4 lame --abr 16 -m j -q 0 --resample 22.05 --priority 4
Well, this is weird.https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,114145https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,114147
Yes I have created those new threads because those are specific to the corresponding topic and those threads will attract more viewers.
Going from 64 to 32kbps and from stereo to mono should reduce the data to 50% while still keeping acceptable quality.
Stereo to mono does not (roughly) half the data?
FileOptimizer at Sourceforge
the bitrate is not connected to the amount of channels but is the total bitrate for the file, de bitrate is then shared between the channels via pure stereo or joint stereo mode (or dual mono IIRC).
my brain must have partially switched off or something.
Quote from: dhromed on 01 June, 2017, 06:35:19 AMmy brain must have partially switched off or something.And possibly you did not even save any bitrate from downmixing your left & right cerebral hemispheres to mono?