Re: Next page in the hi-rez media scam: A Meta-Analysis of High Resolution Audio Perceptual Evaluati Reply #350 – 2016-11-09 13:50:25 Quote from: old tech on 2016-11-08 23:18:20However, the (overstated) criticism of the Myer and Moran paper is that most of the listening material was not from a hi res master. That has become immaterial, now that we have MiracleQA.From the BS man himself:QuoteCD-quality masters? That's hardly high-resolution.Sure, but it's about the music, right? Stuart indicates that MQA is not about high resolution in the usual sense; it's about "authenticity". "As far as we're concerned, anything from a cylinder forward is legitimate as long as it's the definitive statement about a recording," Stuart told me. "If a recording is important enough, and all there is is a 78, that's where we start. . . We're really concerned about producing the definitive thing," not the thing with the highest bit depth or sampling rate.