Skip to main content
Topic: Bluetooth LC3 (Read 420 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Bluetooth LC3

Reply #1
For 160-350k a lower complexity codec probably made sense. 

Re: Bluetooth LC3

Reply #2
I think the same that Garf about it, basically they want to sell a license for it.
I wonder why they didn't just use Opus instead of creating a new codec?

If you look at the specification, it's basically Opus with a few marginal gadgets thrown in. I'm going to make a not-very-wild guess that you'll need a license for the gadgets, from the people who wrote the standard.

 

 
SimplePortal 1.0.0 RC1 © 2008-2020