Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Listening tests for some new encoders (Read 3557 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Listening tests for some new encoders

On my webpage there are 4 encoder (available for Linux IA32
and Windows). I'm interested in the sound quality of these
4 encoders labeled with A, B, C and D. Don't trust the
bitrate display, there're some fakes.

Differences may occure in high frequency encoding (17...19 kHz)
and in music with a lot of dynamic.

Choose useful examples and rate the encoders. Email me the
result and the name of the used samples.

URL: http://www.uni-jena.de/~pfk/mpp/#news
--  Frank Klemm

Listening tests for some new encoders

Reply #1
Will you be making you results public Frank? I'd be interested in reading about this experiment.

Listening tests for some new encoders

Reply #2
Quote
Originally posted by Tinribs
Will you be making you results public Frank? I'd be interested in reading about this experiment.


Yes, of cause.

I will made some deeper changes in the psycho acoustics in the
next time. After every change I need some tests by people with
good hearing to avoid optimizing the encoder for my ears only.
--  Frank Klemm

Listening tests for some new encoders

Reply #3
are the listeners supposed to concentrate on certain bitrate ranges / presets?
A riddle is a short sword attached to the next 2000 years.

Listening tests for some new encoders

Reply #4
Quote
Originally posted by ssamadhi97
are the listeners supposed to concentrate on certain bitrate ranges / presets?


--standard or --radio

But tweaking listening tests should always be done
at something lower quality setting to get
significant results outside stochastic noise.
--  Frank Klemm

 

Listening tests for some new encoders

Reply #5
Results sent.