Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX (Read 6803 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Hello friends!

Just in some other thread I came to know about a page  jthz.com/mp3

It's misleading. It  offers download of Lame 3.97 MMX which isn't out yet.

Another thing is that files encoded with this version are reckognized by EncSpot, Mr Q.Man or AudioIdentifier as if they were encoded using 3.97 only, where as I doubt that they are using the alpha release code.

Rihtnow everybody knows that only alphas are there, but after release of actual 3.97, it can cause a problem as all these software are guessing it as 3.97 only

Now a Question
==========
Is this guessing because of lame tags? I mean what if I make my own version usin code of 3.90.3 and declare it as 3.96.1 using some techniq, nobody would realize it!

(
Of course that's why there is a recommended download thread pinned, but what about newcomers?

I'll give an example.

-> lame.sourceforge.net shows where to find binaries.
-> The second link is mitiok.cjb.net and it also states that another mirror is original russian site which points to jthz.com/~lame (mitiok's original page)
-> Now a person might think what is jthz, lets check out. From JTHZ.com, he surfs the site and finds a page jthz.cpm/mp3 where the downloadable version is 3.97 MMX along with how to use to achieve best quality
-> So now he is happy and downloads it!
-> He might forget that latest version is 3.96.1 only. Or he would think that some one didn't update it! These are speculations a newbie can do!

)

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #1
I would have no problem recommending 3.97 to newbies. 3.90 is old, slow and not better than 3.97 (to me).

I am using 3.97 and will never touch 3.90 again. Remember Mppenc 1.15 is also -alpha-, Aotuv b4 is also not very tested..

I encoded 50 tracks with 3.97a10 -V4 --vbr-new. No quality problems so far and speed is demonic. The more 3.96 & 3.97 downloads the better.


I suppose you could email them and get them to add *stable* and *alpha* to the descriptions.

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #2
Quote
I would have no problem recommending 3.97 to newbies. 3.90 is old, slow and not better than 3.97 (to me).[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=310614"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

The thing is, most of us already know 3.97 alpha 10.
But what is this 3.97 MMX?

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #3
Edited:
=====

sorry if anybody hurt! i was just trying to say that there is an encoder out there which is not official. and just that the reply was not answer to my question.

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #4
Quote
Quote
I would have no problem recommending 3.97 to newbies. 3.90 is old, slow and not better than 3.97 (to me).

I am using 3.97 and will never touch 3.90 again. Remember Mppenc 1.15 is also -alpha-, Aotuv b4 is also not very tested..

I encoded 50 tracks with 3.97a10 -V4 --vbr-new. No quality problems so far and speed is demonic. The more 3.96 & 3.97 downloads the better.


I suppose you could email them and get them to add *stable* and *alpha* to the descriptions.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=310614"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


JUST GREAT!

I POST ABOUT BEING AWARE THAT SOME PEOPLE ARE MAKING THEIR VERSIONS. THEY DONOT BELIEVE IN ABX. AND THEY SAY IT IS 3.97 MMX WHICH IS CERTAINLY NOT. EVEN GUESSING TOOLS ARE GUESSING THEM AS 3.97. I QUERY FOR ANSWER WHY THIS HAPPENS.

AND U R SUGGESTING THAT I SHOULD EMAIL THEM INFORMING WHAT THEY ARE DOIN IS NOT RIGHT. PLZ ADD ALPHA!

JUST GREAT!
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=310625"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Please stop screaming.

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #5
Quote
jthz.com/mp3
It's misleading. It  offers download of Lame 3.97 MMX which isn't out yet.
jthz.com/~lame

I am totally mystified by your post.  I have tried numerous times at both the above links to find this mysterious compile of LAME 3.97 MMX you speak of, and cannot find it.  All binaries are clearly marked as alpha 10, and produce mp3's that encspot recognizes as such.

What gives?

Regards,
Madrigal

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #6
Quote
Quote
jthz.com/mp3
It's misleading. It  offers download of Lame 3.97 MMX which isn't out yet.
jthz.com/~lame

I am totally mystified by your post.  I have tried numerous times at both the above links to find this mysterious compile of LAME 3.97 MMX you speak of, and cannot find it.  All binaries are clearly marked as alpha 10, and produce mp3's that encspot recognizes as such.

What gives?

Regards,
Madrigal
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=310630"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Dear Madrigal, I think u've tried jthz.com/~lame
But you didn't try jthz.com/mp3
It is a document titled
"Creating quality audio-files using Windows, L.A.M.E., Ogg Vorbis"
If you scroll through that page you'll find out what I meant

FYI: This lame is shipped with BlueRazorLame (?) software

OK! I'll Give you direct link

Code: [Select]
http://jthz.com/mp3/


Code: [Select]
http://www.knook.demon.nl/razorlamepack.exe For BlueRazorLame setup


OR
Code: [Select]
http://www.knook.demon.nl/razorlamepack.zip For Zip archive containing 3.97 MMX


And the image of encoder

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #7
Quote
Please stop screaming.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=310627"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Sorry! I thought it was a troll since I was talking about another issue and he was suggesting another thing.

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #8
To answer your question, I am 99% sure that the version info is written to the LAME tag, on which Encspot & Co. rely. All you need is an editor and a compiler.

You'd have to use cryptographic methods to ensure authenticity.

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #9
Quote
To answer your question, I am 99% sure that the version info is written to the LAME tag, on which Encspot & Co. rely. All you need is an editor and a compiler.

You'd have to use cryptographic methods to ensure authenticity.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=310652"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


But I did try disabling lame tag using -t switch. It still shows as Lame 3.97. Isn't there any way to expose this encoder?


About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #10
That jthz website is run by lunatics and there was already a warning here to avoid it (citay?). Just look at those pretty commandlines - how flattering !

In short - avoid that website or any site they link.

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #11
Quote
That jthz website is run by lunatics and there was already a warning here to avoid it (citay?). Just look at those pretty commandlines - how flattering !

In short - avoid that website or any site they link.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=310663"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


That's pretty much correct. Julius, the guy responsible for that page, annoyed us with his "lamelines" since years ago on the r3mix.net forum and became the laughing stock of the forum and our chatrooms, due to his weird posts and recommendations. We also had a good time when Panos Stokas posted his listening test, which is linked from Julius' page.

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #12
Ok, thanks for showing me where to look.

Buried inside the razorlamepack.zip file linked on that page is the following about.txt file:

"LAME 3.97 Win32 CLI executable (based on alpha 10)

Compiled by Intel C++ 4.5 compiler and Netwide-assembler.
ACM compiled with MSVC 6.0 & NASM.

Modified and re-compressed with http://upx.sourceforge.net/
packed by <jultus@gmail.com>  Targeted at the smart VBR user.

Please do not delete this file !"

This was the only place I could find alpha 10 mentioned, and I'm not sure if their installer version mentions it at all.  Not much of a warning for newbies, as mathematician pointed out.

By all means, let's avoid that jthz website like the plague !

Regards,
Madrigal

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #13
The "MMX" thing is merely telling you what CPU Features your CPU has!

Code: [Select]
CPU Features: MMX (ASM Used)

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #14
Quote
The "MMX" thing is merely telling you what CPU Features your CPU has!

Code: [Select]
CPU Features: MMX (ASM Used)

[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=310743"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


try lookign at the line aobive which states the version as 3.97 MMX
Code: [Select]
LAME version 3.97 MMX (http://jthz.com/mp3)
Sven Bent - Denmark

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #15
LAME is open source. the modification seems to be mainly done to the version info (ie jthz.com/mp3 instead of the original LAME link) and that info is written into the ancillary data section. tools look there to recognize the lame version.

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #16
Quote
That's pretty much correct. Julius, the guy responsible for that page, annoyed us with his "lamelines" since years ago on the r3mix.net forum and became the laughing stock of the forum and our chatrooms, due to his weird posts and recommendations. We also had a good time when Panos Stokas posted his listening test, which is linked from Julius' page.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=310671"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


He's reached a new low - he's now catching links from HA and redirecting them to a page where he rants about it!

I particularly like the part that says 'We never follow results from "listening tests"' - like we hadn't guessed that already! :-)

Cheers,
David.

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #17
Quote
Quote
That's pretty much correct. Julius, the guy responsible for that page, annoyed us with his "lamelines" since years ago on the r3mix.net forum and became the laughing stock of the forum and our chatrooms, due to his weird posts and recommendations. We also had a good time when Panos Stokas posted his listening test, which is linked from Julius' page.
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


He's reached a new low - he's now catching links from HA and redirecting them to a page where he rants about it!
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=310881"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Indeed. Well, let's stop linking to him then, shall we? Relevant links changed to non-clickable.

Heck, he even posted on HA once: [a href="http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?act=ST&f=15&t=10695&st=0]http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....15&t=10695&st=0[/url] (Optimod). "delusions of grandeur".. did he trademark that phrase already? 

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #18
Quote
Indeed. Well, let's stop linking to him then, shall we?


Yes! That's true! By the way, those blue razorlame links remained clickable. I've changed that to codeboxes, because those links also points to that so called 97th version

Regards,

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #19
Quote
As far as LAME goes, we sometimes recompile our own releases with adaptations based on different opinions about certain settings. Being frequent users, we do many tests with it based on personal taste and personal interpretations. This webpage is maintained by me, my cousin and Jaap de Jong. We all use LAME and MP3 professionally (that is to say, we release MP3 files not just for our own listening pleasure, and are also involved with broadcast-uses of it). The settings mentioned on this page are used for the audio WE encode, they apply to the choice of LAME release one can download from this page (and NO other). Specialized collected presets, like for example the "alt-presets" are called "alt" for a reason; They are alternatives, and tend to go wrong on new versions of LAME. Plus, we like to stay in control of ALL parameters, since we disagree with the trade-offs done for standardized presets. We never follow results from "listening tests", especially not those controlled by people who refuse(d) to let us take part in it (using pathetic IP-blocks and the likes, two can play that game), i.e. everybody involved with (or strongly siding with) certain webfora that feel the need to call all of our writing "misinformation" - stay away from those fools! Quite often they're extremely biased (there's a lot of money involved in MP3, ISDN and APT-X codec sales, digistream and satellite audio uplink equipment and so on) and/or funded by codec-fanboys who are unable to deal with contradicting (often technically superior) opinions on sound. Furthermore results are unrealistic because tests have been done using EVERY random ear out there (as if suddenly expert knowledge would not count). So always check different LAME settings YOURSELVES, don't follow comments written by self-appointed 'experts', and you may decide on *our* expertise in the field by looking here, here or here.

This whole paragraph is hilarious, particularly the ending.

Basically there saying:
"Don't trust the people who participated in a blind, scientifically valid test.  Trust us, cause we say so."

And there's the bit on trade off's on standardized presets.  Just what trade-offs are these?

Crazy stuff.

:offtopic: Happy July 4th to all the Yanks on this board.

 

About a misleading page for Lame 3.97MMX

Reply #20
Quote
... So always check different LAME settings YOURSELVES, don't follow comments written by self-appointed 'experts', and you may decide on *our* expertise in the field by looking here, here or here.

Ha, ha, ha, and definitely ha-ha-ha.