Skip to main content
Topic: A personal LAME APS problem tracks test. (Read 16311 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

A personal LAME APS problem tracks test.

Reply #25
Any conclusions yet?

Could you somehow say that there's less artifact with V2 than wth V0 

I have tried most of those tracks on V0 and most of seem to be transparent and some just sound better, but sometimes I can ABX V0 aswell and I have managed to spot more artifacts on more tracks at V2. It kinda sucks when you can manage to ABX a 280kbps VBR Mp3 with a cheap soundcard and headphones. And sometimes V1 ends up the same file size as V0 does and for some reason the artifact on Back The F**k at V1 sounds alot worse.
"I never thought I'd see this much candy in one mission!"

A personal LAME APS problem tracks test.

Reply #26

Any conclusions yet?

Could you somehow say that there's less artifact with V2 than wth V0 

I have tried most of those tracks on V0 and most of seem to be transparent and some just sound better, but sometimes I can ABX V0 aswell and I have managed to spot more artifacts on more tracks at V2. It kinda sucks when you can manage to ABX a 280kbps VBR Mp3 with a cheap soundcard and headphones. And sometimes V1 ends up the same file size as V0 does and for some reason the artifact on Back The F**k at V1 sounds alot worse.

That's theorically "sad" because from a version to another there's improvement as well as the contrary. Even worse a command line could be great with a song and not that good with another one!

Apart from that, in a practical way, my ears aren't well trained so V5 could do me (  don't hit me!)

EDIT: do you think you could make a difference (ABX) between 320 and V0?

 
SimplePortal 1.0.0 RC1 © 2008-2019