ReplayGain - FLAC native method vs. Foobar2000 method. 2017-09-08 11:05:12 My question is, while foobar2000 changed its method of calculating RG to the EBU R128 thing couple of years ago, did the FLAC native RG scanning adopt the same reference or is it still based on the old method?Is there any real advantage with R128 against FLAC native RG scanning?Reason I ask is because I am going to test some Linux tools to see if EAC and foobar2000 are fully replaceable with the combination of the following applications: foobnix (as the player), whipper (as the cd ripper w/ AR support) and Perl Audio Converter to substitute the foobar2000 converter. At this point, I know these Windows only applications can run under WINE, but I'm not really interested in this. This is why I ask, is R128 that important or of any concern... my whole library has a RG under this reference. Thank you for your answers.