What kind of noise or distortion does a marginal USB cable make?
I don't think that any of the common audiophile descriptions fit.
Those audiophiles aren't subjectivists, Floyd Toole ans Sean Olive are subjectivists.
The audiophiles are more neo-subjectivists.
The thing is, opinions about differences in sound quality are not welcome unless they can be backed up with evidence in accordance with our rules (have you read our rules?). If you don't have acceptable evidence, then don't make them.
I can't tell much from my side. I get an `std::runtime_error` from my decoder, and I bail out as it is assumedly hosed.
None of that is very clear. All of this should be possible with a regular audio editor (Audacity, etc.), if the filters are fixed. I'm guessing this is some kind of audio compression and that the filters are not fixed.
More specifically, optimum results have been achieved by using a filter having a 12 decibel per octave slope from 0 to 15,000 cycles per second.That doesn't make sense unless it's a variable frequency filter. i.e. 12dB per octave high-pass at 10kHz means something. A high-pass or low-pass filter has a single cutoff frequency. A bandpass filter has a low & high cutoff, but a 0-15KHz "bandpass" filter is a low-pass filter. If it's variable, what controls the cut-off frequency?
In one specific embodiment, this filter is formed by a pair of tuned amplifier circuits each having a 6 decibel per octave slope within the frequency range of interest.Again, not enough information.
In this embodiment, the speech waveform is preferably combined with a high frequency noise masking signal of lower amplitude prior to processing.What frequency, what level, and what's the frequency band of this "high frequency noise"?
Another normalizeIt's kind of unusual to clip after normalizing. Well... Since clipping is distortion it's unusual to intentionally clip at all... Sometimes you normalize after processing to prevent clipping.
For many, audio is a hobby - not a profession. Hobbies involve emotions so we always will find subjective comments in these forums, like this one, which is a crappy opinion coming from a low IQ man that can't back it p with scientific evidence or A/B tests on audio professional and enthusiast random samples.
Hi is there a high pass filter component that will achieve the following
More specifically, optimum results have been achieved by using a filter having a 12 decibel per octave slope from 0 to 15,000 cycles per second. In one specific embodiment, this filter is formed by a pair of tuned amplifier circuits each having a 6 decibel per octave slope within the frequency range of interest. In this embodiment, the speech waveform is preferably combined with a high frequency noise masking signal of lower amplitude prior to processing.
Then another for clipper
How does it sound if you use the onboard sound? still the same distortion?
it sounds okay i guess, cant really tell since the max volume desktop+k712 is still low to say for sure. i tried checking mojo's site to check for new drivers, checked windows update/device managers aswell. nothing. 16 and 24/44.1/48 is w/ mojo is not that bad when it comes to vocal. but when it comes to 24/96 i can hear the distortion clearly. did i miss something? components? asio4all settings? foobar settings itself? i maxed the sample/bit on windows which is 32/384 ticked allow exclusive. asio4all=512 samples/32 in/out
If it onboard sounds ok then have you tried updating the drivers for your chord mojo?
Last post by Zao -
@EpicForever The archive seems to be broken in both 7zip and WinRAR:
! F:\Downloads\seekbar_disappears.7z: CRC failed in seekbar_disappears\Dieselboy & Technical Itch – Atlantic Connection SEEKBAR DISAPPEARS.VOB. The file is corrupt
! F:\Downloads\seekbar_disappears.7z: Error - operation failed