Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: What do you all do with LOUD discs? (Read 11131 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

All:

I am realizing with my new setup that I have tons of recordings that are just TOO LOUD.  It really sucks, and I have started using the "Normalization" option on EAC when I rip them.  It doesn't really help that much. 

I am using a Lynx L22 for playback at +4db.  Even at -10db, it still clips on these loud discs.  It's very irritating, and seems to take away any dynamics that might have been there.  I started using "Soft Clipping" on Foobar2K, and it's okay, but doesn't solve the problem. 

I am running this into a nice 2 channel rig, and I can hear it clipping, and compressing a lot on a lot of discs.  This wasn't a problem with my old tube DAC/transport combo, but it wasn't nearly as revealing, and had much lower output.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,

B

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #1 –
Replay Gain.

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #2 –
To learn about ReplayGain read about it here.

You use Foobar 2000 so you can apply ReplayGain using it.

Don't use Foobar 2000 and want to use ReplayGain:
* For MP3's download MP3Gain.
* For OGG's search for VorbisGain to find a suitable download site.
* For MPC's download ReplayGain.

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #3 –
ReplayGain solves the clipping and the volume differences, but what is destroyed (dynamics) it cannot restore...

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #4 –
Thanks guys. . .

I read all through the ReplayGain FAQ, and the rest of the site.  Looks like it's pretty good, and I know Foo2K is compatible.  But. . .  How is it used?  If I have a CD, and I want to use ReplayGain, do I need to rip it again?  Do I put it through some sort of program to tag it?

Thanks again, and please pardon my noobness.

B

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #5 –
No offence to the foobar guys, but the foobar2000
GUI is terrible. To tag your files with replaygain values
you need to right-click on them. You should see a
replaygain menu.

What replaygain does then is scan the file to calculate how
"loud" it is, and adds the tag to the file. Wav files can't be
tagged IIRC (although it's technically feasible using RIFF metadata).

I'm on linux now so I don't follow foobar developments.

EDIT: fixed some typos

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #6 –
I think Foobar's GUI is quite good actually.  Sure it doesn't have all the bells and whistles like Winamp's GUI but who cares?  What matters is the functionality in the program and Foobar has a rediculous amount of functionality.  Almost everything you would want to do with digital audio files is included in Foobar (just a 2MB download with the special installer so it's also rediculously small).  And highlighting all files in a playlist, right-clicking, going to ReplayGain, and clicking on Scan as multiple albums isn't that hard to do is it?

I would recommend using Foobar's replaygain on MP3 files compared to using MP3Gain.  MP3Gain will guarantee that all players will playback the MP3 at the replaygained volume as MP3Gain modifies the actual audio data of the MP3.  However, Foobar just writes the replaygain info to the MP3's ID3v2/APEv2 tag.  I primarily use Foobar and Winamp as players and both provide support for replaygain in tags for MP3.  You just need this plugin for Winamp.

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #7 –
As far as I know Replay Gain isn't supported on portables, so there's a good reason for MP3Gain

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #8 –
what i do is use mp3gain to apply max no clip gain.  And then use FB2K to take it down to 89 db.  The reason I use max no clip gain in mp3gain is so if i go back and make a compilation cd.
"You can fight without ever winning, but never win without a fight."  Neil Peart  'Resist'

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #9 –
Yes for portables MP3Gain has its purpose I guess.  I just like the metadata form of replaygain rather than modifying the actual audio data.  Use whichever works for you 

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #10 –
Quote
Wav files can't be tagged


Well that doesn't work at all for me.  Everything I have on my disk is wav. 

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #11 –
>>What do you all do with LOUD discs?<<

I delete everything that makes my ears hurt... Hopefully the industry will come to their senses in some 5-10 years and rerelease properly mastered versions.

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #12 –
Quote
Quote
Wav files can't be tagged


Well that doesn't work at all for me.  Everything I have on my disk is wav.   

You could use FLAC which will losslessly compress your WAV files and give you tag and replaygain support.

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #13 –
Quote
MP3Gain will guarantee that all players will playback the MP3 at the replaygained volume as MP3Gain modifies the actual audio data of the MP3.  However, Foobar just writes the replaygain info to the MP3's ID3v2/APEv2 tag.

MP3Gain doesn't modify the mp3 by default anymore. It now by default stores the changes in an APEv2 tag. To modify the mp3 as it was done in older versions the undo feature (storing of a tag) has to be disabled.

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #14 –
Quote
Quote
Wav files can't be tagged


Well that doesn't work at all for me.  Everything I have on my disk is wav.   

You can always use wavegain for wav-files.

It will alter the actual audio though, so the resulting wav will be at a somewhat lower resolution, noise has been added.
It is questionable if it hearable.
But most soundcards are 16-bit anyway, so it doesn't really matter to them if the music is altered before playback or during playback.

But it's a definetly better alternative to use FLAC for storing files losslessly and for replaygain.
You will not loose any audiodata, and if you get a 24-bit soundcard it 'can' sound better when playing replaygained FLACs than wavegained waves.


It's also possible to transfer replaygained FLAC -> aac (mp4) in 24-bit res. using dBPowerAmp.
This is good, cause there isn't any Replaygain foraac/mp4.

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #15 –
Quote
This is good, cause there isn't any Replaygain foraac/mp4.

Unless you use foobar .
gentoo ~amd64 + layman | ncmpcpp/mpd | wavpack + vorbis + lame

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #16 –
Quote
Quote
Quote
Wav files can't be tagged


Well that doesn't work at all for me.  Everything I have on my disk is wav.   

You can always use wavegain for wav-files.

It will alter the actual audio though, so the resulting wav will be at a somewhat lower resolution, noise has been added.
It is questionable if it hearable.
But most soundcards are 16-bit anyway, so it doesn't really matter to them if the music is altered before playback or during playback.

But it's a definetly better alternative to use FLAC for storing files losslessly and for replaygain.
You will not loose any audiodata, and if you get a 24-bit soundcard it 'can' sound better when playing replaygained FLACs than wavegained waves.


It's also possible to transfer replaygained FLAC -> aac (mp4) in 24-bit res. using dBPowerAmp.
This is good, cause there isn't any Replaygain foraac/mp4.

Using 24-bit has no advantages really.  It may theoretically "sound" better but I doubt you can hear the difference between a 24-bit sound file to a 16-bit file.
 

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #17 –
Quote
Unless you use foobar .


Jepp you are rigth, but only foobar is able to use this replaygain info at playback, at the moment...It will not be replaygained in t.ex. iPod. For most players one need to adjust volume before encoding mp4.

Quote
Using 24-bit has no advantages really. It may theoretically "sound" better but I doubt you can hear the difference between a 24-bit sound file to a 16-bit file.


Yeah, but knowing that my FLACs are totally lossless even when replaygained, and knowing that my mp4 are encoded from a replaygained  24bits signal, rather than 16bit, makes me sleep better at night.
But you are right...I can't hear the difference.

(Perhaps it might just be that a 128kbit/s mp4 encoded from a replaygained 16-bit source is of higher quality, than one of 24-bit source, because the encoder will have less information to encode when there is only 16bit (replaygained without dither), and therefore have extra bits to encode the information that is left)

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #18 –
Quote
No offence to the foobar guys, but the foobar2000
GUI is terrible. To tag your files with replaygain values
you need to right-click on them. You should see a
replaygain menu.

By golly, you're right. Right clicking sure is hard. It makes so much more sense that you use the main menu bar to scan the selection. The disk writer should also be in a menu. No, wait, even better, let's make the disk writer an output device!

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #19 –
First I replaygain, then I listen several times with headphones. If I get fatigued too often then CD will end up in the used bin or the files sent to recycle bin - It doesn't even matter how good the music is.

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #20 –
Quote
Quote
No offence to the foobar guys, but the foobar2000
GUI is terrible. To tag your files with replaygain values
you need to right-click on them. You should see a
replaygain menu.

By golly, you're right. Right clicking sure is hard. It makes so much more sense that you use the main menu bar to scan the selection. The disk writer should also be in a menu. No, wait, even better, let's make the disk writer an output device!

True. 

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #21 –
Hmh, there actually would be a sollution for your replaygain problem.

I am not sure wether you want all your actual cd's to be normalized, or just normalization for playback within a pc player.

In case you want the second using either FLAC or Monkey's Audio as Loke already said is probably the best sollution.

In case you don't want to do that, you could scan your wav files with FB2K and make sure the database is enabled.  If I am not entirely wrong, FB2K will then write the replaygain values to its database.  Otherwise there is also an experimental feature to write tags to wav files.  In case you keep those files on your pc for long term storage that would be the sensible way to go anyway. It will simply save a lot of diskspace and offer some other advabtages.

You could then after you did that, burn a copy of the cd with Foobars cd writer component (note that this needs Nero to be installed) and make sure Use ReplayGain is enabled in its preferences (The CD wrtier component preferences not the FB2K preferences .  Probably best to keep them both in the same cover then and only use the copy for playback.  Off course you can always do this with lossless files (FLAC, Monkeys) as well.

I know that this is quite a lengthy procedure, but the only workaround I can think off if what you want to achieve is the first case.

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #23 –
ok, question:

i am NOT using the inmpg123 winamp input plugin (or whatever it's called) but i replaygained a couple of tracks via mp3gain and they sounded quieter in winamp.  then i undid the gain adjustment and they went back to the way they were before.

now, if the ability to undo track gain in mp3gain relies on the storing of the gain adjustment value in an apev2 tag, how come winamp played the file back quietly if i'm using an mp3 input plugin that is not apev2 compatible?

What do you all do with LOUD discs?

Reply #24 –
Even the latetest version of mp3gain still actually changes the volume of the mp3. The ape tags only store the gain change information so that you can undo the changes if you needed to. There is also an option to not write these ape tags.