Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: AccurateRip question (Read 1789 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AccurateRip question

Code: [Select]
AccurateRip URL http://www.accuraterip.com/accuraterip/5/f/4/dBAR-009-000f14f5-006c8f37-6409b909.bin
18 AccurateRip reponses found
Track  0: unknown          (not tracked)           
Track  1: rip accurate     (confidence  51 of 191) [f5562466], DB [f5562466]
Track  2: rip accurate     (confidence  50 of 189) [c2913230], DB [c2913230]
Track  3: rip accurate     (confidence  50 of 188) [bfddbede], DB [bfddbede]
Track  4: rip accurate     (confidence  51 of 187) [5173a8dd], DB [5173a8dd]
Track  5: rip accurate     (confidence  50 of 190) [2e31e9f4], DB [2e31e9f4]
Track  6: rip accurate     (confidence  50 of 190) [3f0562f7], DB [3f0562f7]
Track  7: rip accurate     (confidence  50 of 188) [da8829ce], DB [da8829ce]
Track  8: rip accurate     (confidence  50 of 188) [1b85d89e], DB [1b85d89e]
Track  9: rip accurate     (confidence  44 of 180) [3f13c1a2], DB [3f13c1a2]


Am I to understand that the reason why the rip is accurate when the confidence is ~ < 25% on each track is because there are large number with same checksum and there are probably more than one CD with same identification? IE maybe a different pressing of same CD?

AccurateRip question

Reply #2 –
Yes and yes.  The number on the left is the amount of matching checksums that have been reported to accurate rip.

There is usually a much lower amount of reported checksums to compare on most releases.  A confidence of 1 of 1 or 1 of 2 is usually enough for me to feel confident with its accuracy.
JXL