1
General - (fb2k) / Re: Converter - How to set enconder file path RELATIVE - is it possible?
Last post by Cosh -I didn't know at all about /encoder folder till now! ^^
coverflow
// ==PREPROCESSOR==
// @name "CoverFlow View"
// @version "1.0 built 03.12.2024"
// @author "zc"
// @import "%fb2k_component_path%helpers.txt"
// @import "%fb2k_component_path%samples\smooth\common.js"
// @import "%fb2k_component_path%samples\smooth\scrollbar.js"
// @import "%fb2k_component_path%samples\smooth\inputbox.js"
// @import "%fb2k_component_path%samples\smooth\coverflow.js"
// ==/PREPROCESSOR==
update
Hi! No work with JSP 3.8.4
This is how I do it.I know this (manual) way (btw some PC's have different disk numbering) but what I would like to achieve is having all my encoders inside one folder of foobar2000 and be able to run fb2k-Converter without changing encoder path every time I move between PCs. Just to run portable foobar2k easy and smooth on all PCs.
"C:\Encoder\FLAC\flac-1.4.3-x64\flac.exe"
How can I set relative path of the encoder in the converter settings?
This is how I do it.I know this (manual) way (btw some PC's have different disk numbering) but what I would like to achieve is having all my encoders inside one folder of foobar2000 and be able to run fb2k-Converter without changing encoder path every time I move between PCs. Just to run portable foobar2k easy and smooth on all PCs.
"C:\Encoder\FLAC\flac-1.4.3-x64\flac.exe"
👍👍I don't think that "forced" has anything to do with it. Anyone who has followed his comments on these forums is aware of his often petulant eccentricities and behavior towards users. That said, he is also a coding genius and his skills here that have provided so many diverse options for Foobar will be missed.Thanks for bringing some sanity to the forum.
I'm pretty astonished seeing how many insults are allowed in this forum depending on the lines of code you have written (which goes against TOS 2). And someone getting praise despite that behavior makes zero sense to me. Where we set the bar? 100 lines of code gives you a free ticket to insult people? That looks to me like people have to pay with their sanity for a component.
Maybe we can change the pov, and the rest of the forum should not be forced to read passive-aggressive comments and insults every 2 days by someone with clearly toxic dynamics, no matter if its a dev, a genius or your father. And that has nothing to do with developing a component, being forced to close maintenance or not receiving gratitude.
Really hope people get that point and separate software development, ignoring forum TOS or needing to handle their aggressiveness, whether in therapy or by other means. (And any of this doesn't invalidate we may be grateful to that same person)