Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7 (Read 925638 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #450 –
Quote from: jeremija on
i would also like a now playing radio station option, but more importantly, i would like a "love track" option.



Quote from: nausea on
Version 0.4.1 released.

The track auth code needed to ban tracks can now be accessed with the title formatting command $info(lastfm:trackauth), so if the author of foo_audioscrobbler decides to implement love/ban functionality (which is part of the scrobbling api), then that's available for use.


I don't think it's my place to introduce you all and beg.. But pretty pretty please with a cherry on top? 

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #451 –
Hi, I'm new to this forum

Does anyone have a version 1.3.7 or 1.3.8 of this plugin?
Because I want to use albumartist tag instead of artist.

If you have that, could you upload it ?

Thanks.

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #453 –
So, seems that last.fm now does also recognize non-last.fm player's and displays them on the profile. Problem is, that at least for me, foobar with the latest foo_audioscrobbler is displayed as "WinAMP" on last.fm. :E
Guess thats a problem on last.fm's side or can it be "fixed" in the plugin?
SING A SONG -No Music, No Life-

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #455 –
Hello everyone. I've got a quick question about the audioscrobbler plugin. I just started using this plugin and I'm not sure if it's working or not. I went into the preferences and entered my username and password. Well, when I go to the console to look at it I just get this:

Audioscrobbler: Still awaiting handshake. Cache contains 51 tracks.
Audioscrobbler: Still awaiting handshake. Cache contains 52 tracks.
Audioscrobbler: Still awaiting handshake. Cache contains 53 tracks.

Also, it doesn't look as if last.fm has gotten any of the info either, unless it takes a while for it to update or something. Basically, I'm wondering if there should be a "handshake success" message, or something of that sort. Thanks a bunch in advance for any help. Sorry if it's a noobish question, haha. I'm new to both last.fm and the audioscrobbler plugin, so I apologize if it is.

EDIT: Nevermind. I restarted foobar and it seems to be working now.

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #456 –
When it's working, it will say:
Code: [Select]
Audioscrobbler: Handshake successful.
...
Audioscrobbler: Submitting track...
Audioscrobbler: Submission succeeded.
elevatorladylevitateme

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #457 –
Hi florian, any chance of considering a "love this track" option in future versions of the component? I know I'm not alone in wanting this feature
we was young an' full of beans

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #458 –
Yeah, I'd *love* that feature too.

But on a sidenote again, am I the only one who got his "Listening now using xxx" on last.fm displayed as Winamp while listening with foobar using foo_audioscrobbler? o_O
Since noone else mentioned it yet... I'm just wondering. :E
SING A SONG -No Music, No Life-

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #459 –
My profile doesn't mention any player :/
we was young an' full of beans

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #461 –
Looks like they're still playing around with the player ID thing, I hope they get it working right soon.
I don't even have the Last.fm software installed lol
we was young an' full of beans

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #462 –
Quote from: skelly831 on
Looks like they're still playing around with the player ID thing, I hope they get it working right soon.
I don't even have the Last.fm software installed lol

It shows that when you use there player on their website, makes sense to me. Don't need their software installed, just use their player and it will show that.

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #463 –
Quote from: Sounds Blast on
It shows that when you use there player on their website, makes sense to me. Don't need their software installed, just use their player and it will show that.

I know, that's how it's supposed to work, but I've never used the player on the site
we was young an' full of beans

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #464 –
Hi.  Been using foo_audioscrobbler for some time, and I love it!  However, lately I've been ripping more of my classical collection, and that's causing a scrobbling problem for me.  Reason is, I tag multi-part pieces like this (vorbis tags):

Title=Prelude and Fugue, BWV 547 in C major
Part=1. Prelude

Separating the two lets me do some extra tricks when displaying track information.  The problem, of course, is that the part never gets communicated to last.fm.  Then, I end up with Die Kunst der Fuge and Messiah at the top of my Tracks charts because they get lumped together.  Though, at other times, last.fm seems to ferret out the part (possibly from musicbrainz tags and data).  At any rate, can I get foo_audioscrobbler to accommodate this setup?

Thanks.

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #465 –
we was young an' full of beans

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #468 –
Hi

I have a problem with foo_audioscrobbler since August, there is no update on my last.fm profile
If i open the console i get following :
Quote
Album List refreshed in: 0:01.817778
Startup time : 0:04.151175
Audioscrobbler: Handshake successful.
Opening track for playback: "E:\Eigene Musik\~Max musik von meiner seite\Chikinki - Lick Your Ticket\Chikinki - 01 - Assassinator 13.mp3"
Audioscrobbler: Submitting 10 of 2850 cached tracks...
Audioscrobbler: Submission failed: Plugin bug: Not all request variables are set - got 89 parameters.


in my profile you can sometimes see the current title (but it doesnt stay)
next title in my profile is from 7th aug 2008
i try a different settings, and install the newest update of foo_audioscrobbler and foobar but nothing changed... :-(

have you any idea about my problem ?

would be pleased about help,

thx Lyr

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #469 –
Quote from: Lyr on
Quote
Audioscrobbler: Submitting 10 of 2850 cached tracks...
Audioscrobbler: Submission failed: Plugin bug: Not all request variables are set - got 89 parameters.
I guess it has something to do with cached track information that wasn't encoded correctly. There was a bug with versions before foo_audioscrobbler 1.3.16, where the track field wasn't encoded at all.

If you've used one of these versions when the error occurred, the most easiest solution is to remove the plugin, let foobar2000 delete the settings of foo_audioscrobbler with the next start, and install the latest version.

If you're sure that you were using foo_audioscrobbler 1.3.16 at this point, it would be helpful to see what the plugin is trying to send to last.fm.
 

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #470 –
Lyr, maybe that is a problem with tags, and are your tags not ok. I believe last.fm needs artist / title / album to be filled correct.

Quote
Separating the two lets me do some extra tricks when displaying track information. The problem, of course, is that the part never gets communicated to last.fm. Then, I end up with Die Kunst der Fuge and Messiah at the top of my Tracks charts because they get lumped together. Though, at other times, last.fm seems to ferret out the part (possibly from musicbrainz tags and data). At any rate, can I get foo_audioscrobbler to accommodate this setup?


If you need a view, it's better to work at the string to get your view correct, then messing with your tags to accomplish things. You could open a topic with the question regarding this specific view and we can try to help you out with just a string, so your tags can be full and normal titles.

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #471 –
Quote from: Florian on
I guess it has something to do with cached track information that wasn't encoded correctly. There was a bug with versions before foo_audioscrobbler 1.3.16, where the track field wasn't encoded at all.


Hi!

Wow! fast answer, thx!
What you said is quite possible.
If i remove the plugin and let foobar delete the settings as you said, will this mean, that all cached songs are gone? Or is there a chance to keep them alive?

Where or How can i see what the plugin is tryin to send to last.fm?

cheers

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #472 –
Quote from: Lyr on
If i remove the plugin and let foobar delete the settings as you said, will this mean, that all cached songs are gone? Or is there a chance to keep them alive?
Yes, if you let foobar2000 delete your settings, all cached songs will be gone.

Quote
Where or How can i see what the plugin is tryin to send to last.fm?
You can use a network protocol analyzer like Wireshark.

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #473 –
Quote from: Mar2zz on
Lyr, maybe that is a problem with tags, and are your tags not ok. I believe last.fm needs artist / title / album to be filled correct.

@Mar2zz

Hi and thanks you too...

this could also be a problem. I have a lot of old stuff, that aren't tagged, but it was never a problem with last.fm ... mostly it wasn't registered of last.fm, if it couldn't be read...
i already tagged with foobar a lot of these songs (thx to this great tool i discovered this year!! yeah:-) )
but there is still much to do ... !

foo_audioscrobbler 1.4.7

Reply #474 –
Hi!

As you said Florian, it seems to was a problem with an older version...
I removed the plugin and let delete the settings ... and a 3 month musicstory was blown away ... :-(
but no time to worry about, it's not important at all

more important is, that it work now and i am very happy about that... :-)
maybe it will come with a curious old tag that it will stop again, but now i will know where the problem is

thx alot and cu
i will stay tuned here, a very nice forum!

bye