Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: LAME - FAST or no? (Read 2504 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

LAME - FAST or no?

HI 2 EVERYone!!!


I have an important question 4 the EXPERTs of LAME --preset,
especially about the new 'FAST' option.

Wich settings are better for QUALITY of the MP3
with or without the 'FAST' option?

What does the 'FAST' option for QUALITY?

So for example what is better?

--PRESET FAST EXTREME or --PRESET EXTREME ?
--PRESET FAST STANDARD or --PRESET STANDARD ?
--PRESET FAST MEDIUM or --PRESET MEDIUM?

THX for U help!

CU
BB99

LAME - FAST or no?

Reply #1
Use the forum-search function and read the pinned threads.
I am arrogant and I can afford it because I deliver.

 

LAME - FAST or no?

Reply #2
Short answer is that fast is better because it's faster, and in most cases isn't of worse quality than non-fast (and sometimes is even better).