Spoiler (click to show/hide)
The best way is to add relevant options.That's already integrated into the beta version from yesterday.
As hann is tukey(1), which is "the extreme end" (rectangle being the other), then I would be mildly surprised if it is any good compared to the tried and tested midways.Both hann and blackman are of the cosine sum family but blackman is one step narrower than hann, so it would catch a decay trend which is not as severe as blackman. flattop by itself doesn't make too much sense due to the shape, so I don't use it alone, I use it with other windows so that the unique shape can catch something other windows can't. I only use this combo with >= 88.2k content, with subdivide tukey no more than 5.
Only "mildly" because who knows what works until it is tried ...
If you take those and compareWhen checking this I found something interesting. In my previous post I was comparing -8p with -8b8192 -A "subdivide_tukey(3);blackman;gauss(22e-2)" and assumed if -8p produced a smaller file then that file must be better with -b4096. There are 11 files, 51 minutes fall into this category. However if I only compare -8 with -8b8192 alone, there is only one file (Yu Miyake - WANDA WANDA) works better with -b4096, and only one more file (Cool Zone - The Blessed Place) works better with -b4096 when using -8 -A "subdivide_tukey(3);blackman;gauss(22e-2)", and the total duration of files work better with -b4096 is reduced to 8m 21s, out of 1d 17h 39m 06s. That said, it doesn't mean these 11 files are better with -8p than -8e.
-b 4096 -r <R>
-b 8192 -r <R+1>
what do you get? Upping the partition order by 1 would double the partition number and maintain the partition size in samples - it would be more like the partial effect of -b alone. (The one you posted in #404 does not benefit from doubling block size and increasing the partitioning though.)
Addressed for the next build, thanks for bringing this up.