Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Foobar2000 2.1.4 setup file lack digital signatures (Read 769 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Foobar2000 2.1.4 setup file lack digital signatures

The setup file of Foobar2000 2.1.4 lacks digital signatures. So SmartScreen can not check if it is a genuine file. The older versions do not have this issue. Please fix it.

Re: Foobar2000 2.1.4 setup file lack digital signatures

Reply #1 –
Please use MS Store version of foobar2000 if this troubles you.
By old versions you must mean 10 years old versions, that's when foobar2000 last had a valid digital signature.
Microsoft Windows: We can't script here, this is bat country.

Re: Foobar2000 2.1.4 setup file lack digital signatures

Reply #2 –
I would like to give the Microsoft Store version a try, but it seems there's only the x64 version available. Many of my components are still x86-only, so I can't switch to the Store version. Additionally, the latest version in the Store is 1.6.17, but I'd prefer to use version 2.x...

So, if you could at least provide a SHA256 hash for the installer or even a GPG signature, that would be appreciated.

Re: Foobar2000 2.1.4 setup file lack digital signatures

Reply #3 –
Quote from: mosesofmason on
I would like to give the Microsoft Store version a try, but it seems there's only the x64 version available. Many of my components are still x86-only, so I can't switch to the Store version. Additionally, the latest version in the Store is 1.6.17, but I'd prefer to use version 2.x...
There's no such thing as version 1.6.17 x64.

Version 1.6.17 is available separately from the latest 2.x for people who need full backwards compatibility. It is still being updated with critical bug fixes (1.6.18 will be out soon).

2.x series is available in all CPU architectures, MS Store decides which one to install for you, depending on your system.

Quote from: mosesofmason on
So, if you could at least provide a SHA256 hash for the installer or even a GPG signature, that would be appreciated.
9be23da2b8505180a1f94520dab6e6a741dbe961520bf4ae1eb6a0e68d1f811d ?SHA256*foobar2000_v2.1.4.exe
f948a6a49ff607493d366bb3f334269bc857dd1f5a5e881138a7de10c2b7171d ?SHA256*foobar2000-x64_v2.1.4.exe
Microsoft Windows: We can't script here, this is bat country.
 

Re: Foobar2000 2.1.4 setup file lack digital signatures

Reply #4 –
Quote from: Peter on
Quote from: mosesofmason on
I would like to give the Microsoft Store version a try, but it seems there's only the x64 version available. Many of my components are still x86-only, so I can't switch to the Store version. Additionally, the latest version in the Store is 1.6.17, but I'd prefer to use version 2.x...
There's no such thing as version 1.6.17 x64.

Version 1.6.17 is available separately from the latest 2.x for people who need full backwards compatibility. It is still being updated with critical bug fixes (1.6.18 will be out soon).

2.x series is available in all CPU architectures, MS Store decides which one to install for you, depending on your system.

Thank you for the clarification.

Quote from: Peter on
Quote from: mosesofmason on
So, if you could at least provide a SHA256 hash for the installer or even a GPG signature, that would be appreciated.
9be23da2b8505180a1f94520dab6e6a741dbe961520bf4ae1eb6a0e68d1f811d ?SHA256*foobar2000_v2.1.4.exe
f948a6a49ff607493d366bb3f334269bc857dd1f5a5e881138a7de10c2b7171d ?SHA256*foobar2000-x64_v2.1.4.exe

Thanks, hope this will be part of future releases and listed on the website  :))