Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Wow, a reason to keep Winamp 2 (Read 5709 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Wow, a reason to keep Winamp 2

Heard about this from Call for Help. A shoutcast stream ripper called Stream Ripper. I thought the standalone program kinda sucked, but the plugin for Winamp is very cool. Maybe someone here would consider making a plugin for foobar.
RedawgTS
King of all the little people with really big swords.

Wow, a reason to keep Winamp 2

Reply #1
You can't be serious. Why do you want to rip soutcas stream?

Wow, a reason to keep Winamp 2

Reply #2
Ummm, the point of a high quality audio player is to play high quality audio.

If you want to rip on Foobar for not having your "neccesary" ripper of $hity audio streams, go on the Winamp forum and sing your praises of its plugin. How dare you claim to like Foobar (yes, you do, you want a plugin for it) yet have that annoying thread subject?

Wow, a reason to keep Winamp 2

Reply #3
You all must be listening to the wrong stations, because there are plenty of good quality (at least as good as 85% of music on Kazaa et. al) streaming audio stations out there.  In any event, there is no need to jump all over this guy's back... 

I rarely rip streaming audio, but I think this is a good idea for a component, especially since the standalone Streamripper does suck.  And since Peter added ICY metadata support to foo_read_inet, it probably wouldn't be hard at all to rework foo_diskwriter to write out individual songs, complete with metadata.

Wow, a reason to keep Winamp 2

Reply #4
I use totalrecorder for my stream recording needs (BBC7 comedy shows streamed in realplayer format).
Of course I had to buy it though..

Wow, a reason to keep Winamp 2

Reply #5
Streambox VCR is good for saving realplayer audio streams (it does lots of streaming video formats too).
Home: M-Audio Revolution 7.1 > Gilmore V2 > Beyerdynamic DT880

Wow, a reason to keep Winamp 2

Reply #6
Quote
I use totalrecorder for my stream recording needs (BBC7 comedy shows streamed in realplayer format).
Of course I had to buy it though..

Yeah, but it's not saved as the original RealAudio format. If you wanted to save size, you'd have to transcode, which is bad.

Wow, a reason to keep Winamp 2

Reply #7
The reason I'm excided about this is because there are not many radio stations in my area and all of them are terrible. With StreamRipper I can rip a good station overnight and bring it with me the next day. As far as quality goes for streaming audio, I don't have great ears and find a 128kbps stream to be exceptable in most cases.
RedawgTS
King of all the little people with really big swords.

Wow, a reason to keep Winamp 2

Reply #8
Quote
The reason I'm excided about this is because there are not many radio stations in my area and all of them are terrible. With StreamRipper I can rip a good station overnight and bring it with me the next day. As far as quality goes for streaming audio, I don't have great ears and find a 128kbps stream to be exceptable in most cases.

IMNSHO, when properly encoded, 128kbps shouldn't have any noticable artifacting (assuming quality-based ABR, of course). It should just chop off enough high-frequency to decrease the bitrate.

Wow, a reason to keep Winamp 2

Reply #9
Quote
Ummm, the point of a high quality audio player is to play high quality audio.

If you want to rip on Foobar for not having your "neccesary" ripper of $hity audio streams, go on the Winamp forum and sing your praises of its plugin. How dare you claim to like Foobar (yes, you do, you want a plugin for it) yet have that annoying thread subject?

What the fuck?
It seemed like a perfectly acceptable request to me.. infact, it seems like something that would be genuinely useful. There are shoutcast stations out there that broadcast at decent bitrates, you know.

Quote
How dare you claim to like Foobar (yes, you do, you want a plugin for it) yet have that annoying thread subject?

That is perhaps the funniest thing I have read all week. Thanks for that.
(I'm not laughing with you, btw.)

Wow, a reason to keep Winamp 2

Reply #10
Quote
at least as good as 85% of music on Kazaa et. al

I see deaf people.

 

Wow, a reason to keep Winamp 2

Reply #11
Quote
Quote
I use totalrecorder for my stream recording needs (BBC7 comedy shows streamed in realplayer format).
Of course I had to buy it though..

Yeah, but it's not saved as the original RealAudio format. If you wanted to save size, you'd have to transcode, which is bad.

This is true but for my purposes not an issue - I'm basically recording speech radio shows to listen to later and then delete. I record to Ogg -q 1 which gets me a half hour show in about 20Mb.

I can see that if I was trying to record music from the streams then the transcoding might be noticeable but if I was actually going as low as recording RealPlayer streams to get my music I probably wouldn't be to bothered by that kind of error (there are already major artifacts in RP streams of music as it is).