HydrogenAudio

CD-R and Audio Hardware => CUETools => Topic started by: Luap on 2009-04-05 07:28:25

Title: Again an EAC log and a Cuetools log..strange?
Post by: Luap on 2009-04-05 07:28:25
Hi everyone: now I got ths disc: very strange. It's EAC log says that every track is accurately ripped, confidence 17 or 18. But now check this Cuetools log..

Code: [Select]
[Disc ID: 000e5d8e-00743f03-8a093f0a]
Track [ CRC    ] Status
 01 [467b4679] (20/26) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #1
 02 [bd5dc520] (19/23) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #2
 03 [5b98c4f9] (20/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #1
 04 [7f51a710] (20/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #1
 05 [bf647e72] (20/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #1
 06 [3b776bce] (20/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #1
 07 [bcf82d88] (20/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #1
 08 [e7bac95a] (20/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #1
 09 [d2c575d0] (20/22) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #1
 10 [ade921b9] (19/21) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #1
Offsetted by 6:
 01 [a6e08a20] (02/26) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #3
 02 [0177788a] (00/23) No matches
 03 [d2cfa930] (00/24) No matches
 04 [f65caff6] (00/24) No matches
 05 [965cdf22] (00/24) No matches
 06 [ff33b844] (00/24) No matches
 07 [40660ff3] (00/24) No matches
 08 [96e2d3c3] (00/24) No matches
 09 [5cef09e3] (00/22) No matches
 10 [396b1990] (00/21) No matches
Offsetted by 454:
 01 [a8744580] (02/26) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #4
 02 [de4bccca] (02/23) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #3
 03 [5ec78e90] (02/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #3
 04 [92f49db6] (02/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #3
 05 [bac3bd22] (02/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #3
 06 [6b74b004] (02/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #3
 07 [cf2819d3] (02/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #3
 08 [0aeed6cd] (02/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #3
 09 [f417fc79] (02/22) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #2
 10 [05f362f0] (02/21) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #2
Offsetted by 478:
 01 [1455541c] (02/26) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #2
 02 [eeb29a72] (02/23) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #1
 03 [51571f6c] (02/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #2
 04 [596cc14e] (02/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #2
 05 [2c593fe2] (02/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #2
 06 [7a65e1dc] (02/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #2
 07 [c72ba37f] (02/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #2
 08 [51ab4072] (02/24) Accurately ripped as in pressing(s) #2
 09 [1b7c4f64] (00/22) No matches
 10 [49af424c] (00/21) No matches

Can someone explain, cause I don't understand this..
Thank you.
Title: Again an EAC log and a Cuetools log..strange?
Post by: sauvage78 on 2009-04-05 07:56:34
This one is simple there is nothing to explain, your rip is accurate with a confidence around 20.

First, ignore the strange number on the right, it's noise due to accuraterip "by track design".
Second, ignore the strange results on the bottom, it's noise due to people with different pressings that didn't rip all tracks. (Offsetted by 6 + Offsetted by 478)

The difference between the pressing Offsetted by 478 & yours may be due to bonus tracks, I dunno.

Not only your rip is accurate with a confidence 20 but you can consider it accurate with a confidence 22, because there is a  pressing Offsetted by 454, that perfectly matches yours too.

Conclusion: this rip is perfect.
Title: Again an EAC log and a Cuetools log..strange?
Post by: Luap on 2009-04-05 08:01:21
Nice! Thank you for your time.

Moderation: Removed useless full quotation of previous post.
SimplePortal 1.0.0 RC1 © 2008-2021