Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Label vs Publisher / Barcode vs Catalog (Read 1371 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Label vs Publisher / Barcode vs Catalog

CUERipper uses a pattern that confuses me.

When ripping a CD (either tracks or image), the tags viewed by foobar2000 are "crossed" so to speak.

What should be viewed in %label% ends up being viewed in %publisher% and what should be viewed in %barcode% ends up being viewed in %catalog%.

Is there any way to force (configure) the program to be coherent?

Re: Label vs Publisher / Barcode vs Catalog

Reply #1 –
I did some mistakes in the picture, but the text is right.

Instead of "Label n.", the green color would be "Catalog" in foobrar.

Re: Label vs Publisher / Barcode vs Catalog

Reply #2 –
http://age.hobba.nl/audio/tag_frame_reference.html
CATALOG is used in lieu of EAN/UPN as that's the command name used in the CUE file for UPC/EAN
PUBLISHER is being used for the 'record label'
LABELNO is used for the record label-specific catalogue number (not the barcode)

Quote
Is there any way to force (configure) the program to be coherent?
https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php?topic=118915.0#post_g10
korth

Re: Label vs Publisher / Barcode vs Catalog

Reply #3 –
Cool.
@korth I'm learning a lot here, thanks for all!