Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Recent Posts
2
FLAC / Re: FLAC v1.4.x Performance Tests
Last post by Porcus -
Quote from: bennetng on
Also, -b8192 at 88.2/96k is not as safe as at 176.4/192k, a portion of materials may still work best at -b4096 or -b4608.
My observation too. (Let's see how it still holds up when my computer is donw with the upsamples to various frequencies ...)

Quote from: bennetng on
As for my arrangement with bizarre spectrum, honestly I did not know the performance of -8pe is really this bad when compared to -8 alone (1780kbps -> 1779kbps).
That isn't -8pe bad, that is -8 good  :))

Quote from: bennetng on
Both are same?
Oops. Edited! https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=125366 , four most recent posts.
3
FLAC / Re: FLAC v1.4.x Performance Tests
Last post by bennetng -
Also, -b8192 at 88.2/96k is not as safe as at 176.4/192k, a portion of materials may still work best at -b4096 or -b4608. As for my arrangement with bizarre spectrum, honestly I did not know the performance of -8pe is really this bad when compared to -8 alone (1780kbps -> 1779kbps). I expected at least around 5-10kbps reduction.

Quote from: Porcus on
https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,122949.msg1016038.html#msg1016038 and https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,122949.msg1016038.html#msg1016038 .
Both are same?
5
FLAC / Re: FLAC v1.4.x Performance Tests
Last post by Porcus -
@Wombat : How about against -8p and -8pb8192?

For CDDA, I made the following observation: The "5" in  -8 -A "subdivide_tukey(5)" would nearly be enough to catch -8p on size (and I think it did catch -8e) and be twice as fast. But if you were willing to take the slowdown from the "5", you should be willing to take the slowdown of the -8p too, as it would save more bytes per second:
https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,123025.msg1016625.html#msg1016625
More writeup here: https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,123025.msg1016761.html#msg1016761 (I wonder from vague memory: did 1.4.3 speed up -r7?)
Highly dependent on build, but 20 percent more time for using a CLANG build isn't that much when we are talking settings that might be several times as slow as -8.
BTW, hann = tukey(1). Or well maybe due to some roundoffs, only slightly different.

For high resolution material, there is still something to -e - and as you point out, results vary across files.
The hypothesis is that is isn't the high resolution per se, it is that the ultrasonic part is pretty much empty - explaining also why some dark ambient (low treble content) benefits from -e. Four most recent posts from this user: https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=125366
(edit: corrected link).
(Wonder how much one could tell by FFT-ing the signal and considering the top octave or so. Heck, the block will already be windowed.)
6
Support - (fb2k) / Re: A possible Xing VBR tag issue
Last post by Peter -
foobar2000 looks for two consecutive MP3 frames that look like they belong to the same stream before starting to actually look at their contents.
This is the best way of skipping garbage in MP3 files without reading into nonsense that I could devise and it has worked very well for some 20 years now.
I'm not changing it to mitigate someone else's bug, it would certainly do more harm than good.
9
foobar2000 mobile / Re: Report a whole track album playback bug V1.4
Last post by yisisixu -
Quote from: Peter on
Perhaps the problem is Android 4.1 itself.
I just tested Android 4.2 tablet and got crashes on startup due to unresolved symbols before even running my code.
Downgrading compiler from NDK 25 to NDK 23 fixed it for the next build.

We will celebrate Mid-Autumn Festival and National Day tomorrow.
holiday for eight days, :)
I plan to upgrade to the latest version.

My biggest pain is that add everone CUE files TO one playlist . albums more than twenty,  i will rebuild playlist if software crash.
this method has complicated steps and will take very long time.
It's wonderful process to playlist if achieved fast add （eg.Right click the CUE file identify INDEX.）

The above statement is a bit contradictory, but I don't know how to express it.
Thanks again.


10
foobar2000 mobile / Re: Report a whole track album playback bug V1.4
Last post by yisisixu -
Quote from: Peter on
Please clarify:
".Click on Settings，process INDEX to newlist"

Thanks  reply.

this mean is INDEX like below CUE file ， process to new playlist . "TOOLS - CONTEXT MENU - PROCEED"

Code: [Select]
PERFORMER "Various"
TITLE "Power of Piano"
FILE "CDImage.flac" WAVE
  TRACK 01 AUDIO
    TITLE "Piano Sonata No.14 in C sharp minor Op.27 - 3. Presto Agitato"
    PERFORMER "Beethoven"
    INDEX 00 00:00:00
    INDEX 01 00:00:01
  TRACK 02 AUDIO
    TITLE "Ballade in G minor Op.23 No.1"
    PERFORMER "Chopin"
    INDEX 01 07:10:06
  TRACK 03 AUDIO
    TITLE "Prelude in G sharp minor Op.32 No.12"
    PERFORMER "Rachmaninov"
    INDEX 01 16:24:08
  TRACK 04 AUDIO
    TITLE "Prelude in C sharp minor Op.45"
    PERFORMER "Chopin"
    INDEX 01 19:18:42
  TRACK 05 AUDIO
    TITLE "June Barcarolle Op.37 No.6"
    PERFORMER "Tchaikovsky"
    INDEX 01 25:29:10
  TRACK 06 AUDIO
    TITLE "Novermber Troika Op.37 No.11"
    PERFORMER "Tchaikovsky"
    INDEX 01 30:52:58
  TRACK 07 AUDIO
    TITLE "Tarantella No.2 Op.17"
    PERFORMER "Rachmaninov"
    INDEX 01 33:50:54
  TRACK 08 AUDIO
    TITLE "Sonata in B minor K.87"
    PERFORMER "Scarlatti"
    INDEX 01 39:51:37
  TRACK 09 AUDIO
    TITLE "Etude in D sharp minor Op.8 No.12"
    PERFORMER "Scriabin"
    INDEX 01 44:17:64
  TRACK 10 AUDIO
    TITLE "Nocturne in E flat major Op.55 No.2"
    PERFORMER "Chopin"
    INDEX 01 46:35:11
  TRACK 11 AUDIO
    TITLE "Piano Sonata No.13 in E major Op.27 - 1st Mov"
    PERFORMER "Beethoven"
    INDEX 01 52:40:64
  TRACK 12 AUDIO
    TITLE "Hungarian Dances No.1"
    PERFORMER "Brahms"
    INDEX 01 58:30:56


I mainly use it to play lossless whole track music.




MOD edit: fix missing /quote