Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: foo_discogs (Read 1372179 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

foo_discogs

Reply #900
Would there be any way to use index tracks for tagging? For example, see ...
...
This can be extremely helpful when tagging multi-disc releases (ie. the cd name, if any, is always given as an index track).

Your proposal makes sense and I may implement it, but I want to know first if other people are interested in this way of handling index tracks.

I don't know if i got the idea but I found Index tags always difficult to handle while using foo_discogs.

My workaround is to manually delete the "surplus" tracks in the release preview screen and only to leave the first one. Afterwards I renamed this track accordingly.

Example:

(Confusing) example: Kyuss

I prefer to have the track titles like:

[01] I: Gardenia / Asteroid / Supa Scoopa and Mighty Scoop (17:46)
[02] II: 100° / Space Cadet / Demon Cleaner (14:51)
[03] III: Odyssey / Conan Troutman / N.O. / Whitewater (18:19)
[04] Lick Doo (0:58)

At discogs it looks like that:

   I (17:46)
1a         Gardenia       
1b         Asteroid       
1c         Supa Scoopa And Mighty Scoop       
     II (14:51)
2a         100 Degrees       
2b         Space Cadet       
2c         Demon Cleaner       
     III (18:19)
3a         Odyssey       
3b         Conan Troutman       
3c         N.O.       
3d         Whitewater       
     - (0:58)
4         Lick Doo

It would be a fine feature if discogs could "collapse" the index tracks acordingly, but I don't know how this could be achieved.

foo_discogs

Reply #901
Would there be any way to use index tracks for tagging? For example, see ...
...
This can be extremely helpful when tagging multi-disc releases (ie. the cd name, if any, is always given as an index track).

Your proposal makes sense and I may implement it, but I want to know first if other people are interested in this way of handling index tracks.

I don't know if i got the idea but I found Index tags always difficult to handle while using foo_discogs.

My workaround is to manually delete the "surplus" tracks in the release preview screen and only to leave the first one. Afterwards I renamed this track accordingly.

Example:

(Confusing) example: Kyuss

I prefer to have the track titles like:

[01] I: Gardenia / Asteroid / Supa Scoopa and Mighty Scoop (17:46)
[02] II: 100° / Space Cadet / Demon Cleaner (14:51)
[03] III: Odyssey / Conan Troutman / N.O. / Whitewater (18:19)
[04] Lick Doo (0:58)

At discogs it looks like that:

   I (17:46)
1a         Gardenia       
1b         Asteroid       
1c         Supa Scoopa And Mighty Scoop       
     II (14:51)
2a         100 Degrees       
2b         Space Cadet       
2c         Demon Cleaner       
     III (18:19)
3a         Odyssey       
3b         Conan Troutman       
3c         N.O.       
3d         Whitewater       
     - (0:58)
4         Lick Doo

It would be a fine feature if discogs could "collapse" the index tracks acordingly, but I don't know how this could be achieved.


Yeah, I agree.  If it's possible, this would be a cool feature.

Also, plugin still isn't pulling data.  I'm going to assume that Discogs has changed something once again.

foo_discogs

Reply #902
discogs.com is overloaded today and thus the plugin timeout sometimes at getting data.
So be patient until they get up to speed again.

foo_discogs

Reply #903
discogs.com is overloaded today and thus the plugin timeout sometimes at getting data.
So be patient until they get up to speed again.


Thanks.  Can't live without my beloved foo_discogs. 

foo_discogs

Reply #904
IMHO that doesn't depend on Discogs but on the way the tracks are implemented on the disc. If they have track markers, Discogs will show them as separate tracks and if it's a single track, only distinguished by subtitles on the sleeve, Discogs will have a single track in their db accordingly.

I prefer to have the track titles like:

[01] I: Gardenia / Asteroid / Supa Scoopa and Mighty Scoop (17:46)
[02] II: 100° / Space Cadet / Demon Cleaner (14:51)
[03] III: Odyssey / Conan Troutman / N.O. / Whitewater (18:19)
[04] Lick Doo (0:58)

At discogs it looks like that:

   I (17:46)
1a         Gardenia       
1b         Asteroid       
1c         Supa Scoopa And Mighty Scoop


foo_discogs

Reply #905
IMHO that doesn't depend on Discogs but on the way the tracks are implemented on the disc. If they have track markers, Discogs will show them as separate tracks and if it's a single track, only distinguished by subtitles on the sleeve, Discogs will have a single track in their db accordingly.


Unfortunately, that's not the case.  For example, there's Lustmord's "The Place Where The Black Stars Hang".  I have that exact release and it's one single track.  For some reason, they even mention this in the notes, but yet it exists as if it was indexed.  There are 3 other versions of the album, but they all have discrete tracks.  That's only one example, but I've encountered many more.  The fortunate part is that it's an extremely small fraction of the total tracks that I tag.

foo_discogs

Reply #906
Seems to be working now. . . .

foo_discogs

Reply #907
Confirmed.  Seems to be fine. 

foo_discogs

Reply #908
http://www.discogs.com/artist/Rosetta+%282%29 < When trying to find this artist it finds everything else, but not this.

Also when trying to find "Trap Them" it finds someone called Chris Maggio.

Why does this problem still exist ? (finding wrong artists even when the artist(s) I am trying to find are in the discogs' db.) It has been there for ages, the bug I mean.

foo_discogs

Reply #909
http://www.discogs.com/artist/Rosetta+%282%29 < When trying to find this artist it finds everything else, but not this.

Also when trying to find "Trap Them" it finds someone called Chris Maggio.

Why does this problem still exist ? (finding wrong artists even when the artist(s) I am trying to find are in the discogs' db.) It has been there for ages, the bug I mean.



Because there's a new bug from discogs: they don't return exact matches. See http://www.discogs.com/help/forums/topic/216722
Hopefully this will be fixed



foo_discogs

Reply #910
Oh shit... ;_;

foo_discogs

Reply #911
Another bug: I was searching tags for Swedish Shining's V - Halmstad album. It found the artist and album, when I clicked the album V - Halmstad and started checking if everything was right the artist had been changed to "Toolbox".

foo_discogs

Reply #912
Another bug: I was searching tags for Swedish Shining's V - Halmstad album. It found the artist and album, when I clicked the album V - Halmstad and started checking if everything was right the artist had been changed to "Toolbox".


if you used http://www.discogs.com/Shining-V-Halmstad/release/1021907 as the release this is normal. Notice the separate track artists, they take over the main artist (which becomes album artist).

the CD release do not have these separate track artists: http://www.discogs.com/Shining-V-Halmstad/master/57285

foo_discogs

Reply #913
Hi, I also have one question if I may please for answer:

Does exsist any list of letters (charachters / symbols / anything else that does't belong to english alphabet) from where I could see with which new letter (charachter,...) does the plugin changes old, so called ''not accepted by windows OS'', letter?
Here is example of list, to show what I mean with random chosen 5 entries:


Old Letter        ..........              New Letter

    :                ..........                                      ;

    /                ...........                      -

    *                ...........                    x

    ?                ...........          blank (no space given)

    č        .............                  c

Not sure if I wrote the third and fourth one correctly. There are houndreds of different letters / symbols that must be changed if OS (Windows) want to read them. I noticed that plugin don't change them all and what happened to me was that subfolder (folder depth is irrelevant in this case) wasn't readable and therefore I got wrong size, wrong number of folders and wrong files because one (or more) of the files inside that folder contained some symbol similar to " ' " and Windows wasn't able to read it.
So is there any way to get this list with everything (just a few of only most of all wouldn't help) what cannot (and will be replaced) or shouldn't end up in foldername and/or filename? If not; how could I discover this?

foo_discogs

Reply #914
Hi, I also have one question if I may please for answer:

Does exsist any list of letters (charachters / symbols / anything else that does't belong to english alphabet) from where I could see with which new letter (charachter,...) does the plugin changes old, so called ''not accepted by windows OS'', letter?


This is independent of foo_discogs. It's a foobar thing, and is in the FAQ here. (See right at the bottom).
Unfortunately it's been changed once or twice. It's something that's annoyed me - I'd rather it was a) the same for all "forbidden" characters, and/or b) customizable by me, but oh well, it's one of those "foobar" things

foo_discogs

Reply #915
PS I'm not sure about non-English letters like č. Some are kept, some are transliterated to the nearest roman letter.

foo_discogs

Reply #916
and is in the FAQ here. (See right at the bottom).


Thank you for reply but I have seen this already and it isn't useful in my question that I had. I was asking about complete list of ''replacements''. Those kind of charachters can be houndreds and not just 9 as on this FAQ says. Also the data there is wrong because '':'' is replaced with '';'' and not with ''-''.
Many letters / charachters / symbols are missing such as:

?
^
°
?

`
´
¨
?

ž
š

and a lot more.

Is there a way to get a full list of replacements? If not, how could I discover it? Perhaps some other ''3rd party'' software for Windows does this but this doesn't mean foobar does the same.

foo_discogs

Reply #917
Would there be any way to use index tracks for tagging? For example, see http:
...
This can be extremely helpful when tagging multi-disc releases (ie. the cd name, if any, is always given as an index track).


Your proposal makes sense and I may implement it, but I want to know first if other people are interested in this way of handling index tracks.

I would love you forever for that 

foo_discogs

Reply #918
I would still like to please for the answer on my question...

 

foo_discogs

Reply #919
Is there a way to combine the parsed info into a single tag? For example I like to have the copyright information stored like this: "Label Name - Catalogue #", which goes in the comment field of an id3 v1 tag and in the copyright field of an id3 v2 if the id3 v1 can't hold all the information. I think the best way would be to assign variable names to various parsed parts and then let the user combine those variables (+fixed text elements) as he pleases into various id3 fields. Something along the lines of:
parsed album artist = %1
parsed track artist = %a
parsed track title = %2
parsed album title = %3
parsed label = %4
parsed catalogue number = %5
parsed track number = %t
etc
Then you'd simply populate the various id3 fields with a default scheme and let the user edit it:
artist field: %1
track field: %2
...
comment: %4 - %5

I think this mapping system would be much more flexible and thus useful than the current one, where, as far as I can see, one simply decides whether to write a value or not and in what field to write it in. As an added bonus this same system could be used to rename files & folders, making it easy to construct even complex file/folder naming formats with all the variables and fixed text elements (ie [%5] %1 - %3\%t - %a - %2).

foo_discogs

Reply #920
If you write tags and tries to repeat "Write tags ..." then the artist doesn't appear anymore in the search field.

foo_discogs

Reply #921
Is there a way to combine the parsed info into a single tag? For example I like to have the copyright information stored like this: "Label Name - Catalogue #", which goes in the comment field of an id3 v1 tag and in the copyright field of an id3 v2 if the id3 v1 can't hold all the information. I think the best way would be to assign variable names to various parsed parts and then let the user combine those variables (+fixed text elements) as he pleases into various id3 fields. Something along the lines of:
parsed album artist = %1
parsed track artist = %a
parsed track title = %2
parsed album title = %3
parsed label = %4
parsed catalogue number = %5
parsed track number = %t
etc
Then you'd simply populate the various id3 fields with a default scheme and let the user edit it:
artist field: %1
track field: %2
...
comment: %4 - %5

I think this mapping system would be much more flexible and thus useful than the current one, where, as far as I can see, one simply decides whether to write a value or not and in what field to write it in. As an added bonus this same system could be used to rename files & folders, making it easy to construct even complex file/folder naming formats with all the variables and fixed text elements (ie [%5] %1 - %3\%t - %a - %2).


you can do this with masstagger.
for example for combining "release notes" and "release credits" i use a four actions script:
1) format value from other fields > dest. field name - comment; formatting pattern:
Code: [Select]
$if($or(%DISCOGS_RELEASE_NOTES%,%DISCOGS_RELEASE_CREDITS%),$if($and(%DISCOGS_RELEASE_NOTES%,%DISCOGS_RELEASE_CREDITS%),Release notes:$crlf()%DISCOGS_RELEASE_NOTES%$crlf()Release credits:$crlf()%DISCOGS_RELEASE_CREDITS%,$if(%DISCOGS_RELEASE_NOTES%,Release notes:$crlf()%DISCOGS_RELEASE_NOTES%,Release credits:$crlf()%DISCOGS_RELEASE_CREDITS%)),%comment%)
2) format value from other fields > dest. field name - comment > formatting pattern:
Code: [Select]
$if(%COMMENT%,$replace(%COMMENT%,;,$crlf()))
3) remove field > DISCOGS_RELEASE_CREDITS
4) remove field > DISCOGS_RELEASE_NOTES

..and, of course, make a button for that

foo_discogs

Reply #922
If you write tags and tries to repeat "Write tags ..." then the artist doesn't appear anymore in the search field.



This is the intended bahaviour: it fills the release id field instead and you just have to do "Next" to tag again.

foo_discogs

Reply #923
This is the intended bahaviour: it fills the release id field instead and you just have to do "Next" to tag again.


Do you know how many times i typed in the name of the artist?   
Thanks!

Edit:
But i still have to do that to reach another set - an album has sometimes several releases (CD, LP, different labels from different countries, ...). Could you make it optional?

Edit2:
Never mind! I just have to remove the disc id.

foo_discogs

Reply #924
please help me to let foo_discogs to download artist art to separate folder for example f:/images/artists/ALBUM ARTIST and create folder from %album artist% automatically on art download
i guest it all could be coded in Configuration - ArtistArt directory