2007 ripping/encoding general poll
Reply #32 – 2007-01-02 11:35:23
I agree with one poster that perhaps "I don't use any" should be a separate option so all such votes to that question can be "discounted". I could add the option now if you want guruboolez, but it should probably wait until the next one, considering the number of votes already. As you wish. I guess that will reset the poll but revoting shouldn't be too hard I already had the possibility to split the last aswer (10 answers are allowed) but I hesitated and finally merged both into a single one. I originally tried to avoid or limit 'ghost' answers - you know, all answers that only end with 1 or 2‰ of voters and which can't therefore be considered as totally useless. My choice seems to be valid but only for the lossy part; for lossless it seems that an important part of voters don't use lossless - hence the 10% after 160 votes. The poll is only 12 hours old; voting a second time is just a matter of few seconds so I guess it shouldn't be annoying for most people to vote again. Editing the title (provisionally) could be worth : 2007 ripping/encoding poll [UPDATED 02/01/07: VOTE AGAIN] or something like that. What do you think? And if you see something else to change (poor wording, etc...) especially on the thirs poll: don't hesitate.
Wavpack Hybrid: one encoder, one encoding for all scenarios WavPack -c4.5hx6 (44100Hz & 48000Hz) ≈ 390 kbps + correction file WavPack -c4hx6 (96000Hz) ≈ 768 kbps + correction file WavPack -h (SACD & DSD) ≈ 2400 kbps at 2.8224 MHz