Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Wanted v0.9 plugin ports (Read 745265 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #175 –
Apart from various threads where the topic is mentioned - as its not listed here...

foo_shuffle

Yes, I know its in the core and kode54 has stoped dev* on that one (though I had never encountered any instability with it). And i have hopes that the build in shuffle will in time become more customizable - but who knows, so i just add it to the wishlist. (for now the random-path just seeded once for playlist behaviour isn't what I was used to and I am truly missing the control of history size and jump-distance)

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #176 –
I support you there, after having run foobar for several days now, I'm beginning to suspect the real "shuffle-ness" of the thing. While playing with "Shuffle (track)" mode I find that I often stop by the same bands and mathematically speaking that shouldn't happen so often. Now it certainly never is impossible, but that's a behavior I used to have with winamp (but back then I shuffled the playlist instead of playing in shuffle mode). I could do that with foobar but then the playlist look quite wrong.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #177 –
Quote from: Shandra on
Apart from various threads where the topic is mentioned - as its not listed here...

foo_shuffle

Yes, I know its in the core and kode54 has stoped dev* on that one (though I had never encountered any instability with it). And i have hopes that the build in shuffle will in time become more customizable - but who knows, so i just add it to the wishlist. (for now the random-path just seeded once for playlist behaviour isn't what I was used to and I am truly missing the control of history size and jump-distance)


The core shuffle functionality in 0.9 is a completely different implementation. Even if it were possible within the current SDK, I would sooner rewrite that mess than port it, and even that is a far stretch from reality.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #178 –
So much for our great hopes  Well thanks anyway for answering.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #179 –
foo_dsp_pause
I've written a plugin foo_dsp_silence that inserts a configurable amount of silence after each track on playback, similar to what foo_dsp_pause did.
Site
Forum thread
Stay sane, exile.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #180 –
Quote from: kode54 on
The core shuffle functionality in 0.9 is a completely different implementation. Even if it were possible within the current SDK, I would sooner rewrite that mess than port it, and even that is a far stretch from reality.


Yup, thanks for answering 
So lets hope the inbuild shuffle became more mature with 0.9 advancing  And for me its no problem of keeping the 0.8 folder along the 0.9 and use it as my partys/rpg-evenings-jukebox (wich also is due to vis_bacon (where I still used the 0.18 as later versions chrashed the 9x (non-mmx cpu) system I used to have as my jukebox - now with me having a new x64 system that one will be rebuild on 2k (palomino)).

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #181 –
Skip Silence plugin (forget exact name) from 8.3

Was able to after a settable amount of silence start scanning the track till it found sound, usually a hidden track. I like to keep my albums in original layout including lengths of silence leading up to hidden tracks so I can re-create CD's same as original. Thus making the old skip silence plugin needed with my library.

Anything that does this yet?

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #182 –
It's "foo_gapkiller / foo_dsp_nogaps / foo_dsp_skip_silence" in the list, and nope, there is no alternative that I know of at the moment.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #183 –
foo_playlist_tree is currently in beta right now. the beta version works for 0.9

just thought that i should mention that.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #184 –
I just released a beta of foo_write_http at foobar.daychanged.com

Those of you using the plugin for HTML output and remote control will have to wait a bit longer though.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #185 –
What about the Masstagger ?  ( foo_masstag.dll )

[edit] Ok I found it... sorry !

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #187 –
foo_uie_dbexplorer

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #188 –
A timestamp in the "Updated Plugins" section would be great: One would know what's new!


JD


/edit:sorry, didn't mean to just demand stuff. but everything else was said...and we all know how great the developers' work are.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #189 –
I hereby concur with John Doe. Or you (Seldaek) can just add the new stuff at the end of the '## Wanted' and '## Updated' lists, and keep them there for like, umm, 5 days or something.

PS: Thanks to the developers for porting plugins to 0.9, you guys just rock!

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #190 –
Frankly maintaining this topic is already fun enough like that (just try to quote it to see how it looks in the editor..) without having to check for dates and everything.. So as for now, you can press CTRL+F and check if what you need is ported or not pretty quickly. Then you can read this post and the few that followed..
Although I could add a date when I add something to the ported list, I'll try to do that, but I doubt it will be really easier to find out what's new..

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #191 –
Update foo_text please!
 

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #192 –
Q: Would it be sensible/possible for one of the mods to "pin" this discussion in the fb2k/3rd Party Plugins subforum?  I've found it to be an indisposable resource through my 0.83 to 0.9 migration, and I'm sure many others would agree.  All thanks due to Seldaek for keeping things up to date.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #194 –
Btw, developers should post their updated components here. Doesn't look like many people make use of that.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #195 –
Quote from: Remedial Sound on
Q: Would it be sensible/possible for one of the mods to "pin" this discussion in the fb2k/3rd Party Plugins subforum?  I've found it to be an indisposable resource through my 0.83 to 0.9 migration, and I'm sure many others would agree.  All thanks due to Seldaek for keeping things up to date.

Yea, this topic should definitely be pinned imo. Best plugin topic of all.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #196 –
As mentioned above there is already a pinned topic of fb2k 0.9 components in the 3rd party plugins forum. Although it would help if developers actually used it. I am certainly not gonna pin another one on basically the same issue.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #197 –
Requested update for foo_input_ym (the name foo_ym in first post and that I mentionned earlier on this topic is the old name of the component and should be changed)

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #198 –
Quote from: picmixer on
As mentioned above there is already a pinned topic of fb2k 0.9 components in the 3rd party plugins forum. Although it would help if developers actually used it. I am certainly not gonna pin another one on basically the same issue.

Well.. before I even noticed that topic I had already ported about 3 plugins. I hate making multiple consecutive posts. Is it allowed? I'll post there if it is.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #199 –
Maybe the first post of this thread should provide a clear link to the "official topic" - and encourage devs to announce their port in the official topic as well.
I am arrogant and I can afford it because I deliver.