I recently did a sweep test and I can easily hear past 20k (I don't have to turn up the volume or anything). But I had a hard time telling ff123's mustange clips Original from 15kHz cutoff.
I then encoded a some music at --lowpass 16 and could distinguish no loss of frequency.
Does anyone have a clip where the difference is blindly obvious to them. Lowpassing at 16 saves a lot of bits and if I can't tell the difference, why waste them? Perhaps my material does not make it obvious enough.
Peter
Try castanets.
http://lame.sourceforge.net/download/samples/ (http://lame.sourceforge.net/download/samples/)
Originally posted by JohnV
Try castanets.
http://lame.sourceforge.net/download/samples/ (http://lame.sourceforge.net/download/samples/)
Actually once I settled on my settings, I DL'd and encoded everything in that directory. I gave them all a casual listen with no real issues. I could tell on Fatboy and couple of others, but nothing objectionable. I will give Castanets a more critical listen after work.
Peter
I tried the castanets on the ABX training site and can not reliably pick out the 15KHz versus 22KHz sample. I consider this issue settled for me. lowpass 16 should be fine.
Peter
Originally posted by guidryp
I recently did a sweep test and I can easily hear past 20k (I don't have to turn up the volume or anything).
I seriously doubt it. Your equipment is probably not all that good and you're just hearing harmonics around 18kHz when the tone is any higher because the equipment can't play any higher frequencies.
Taking my equipment into account (stopping assuming that I can hear something when the tone doesn't seem to be increasing in pitch anymore) I've determined my own upper hearing limit to be about 19.5 kHz.
Are you sure about yours? Sorry if you are.
Originally posted by NeoRenegade
I seriously doubt it. Your equipment is probably not all that good and you're just hearing harmonics around 18kHz when the tone is any higher because the equipment can't play any higher frequencies.
Are you sure about yours? Sorry if you are.
A longer slower sweep might help. I am running digital out right into my Denon 1802 reciever. Its not junk and should easily reproduce clean 20KHz when not loaded.
I get the same result with the Denon through my Paradigm Monitor 3's as I do with my Koss R/80 Phones.
When I ran a sweep at work with the same Phones coming out of my H/K computer speakers. It was silent from 16KHz or so onward.
Is there a longer sweep out there?
Since I'm at the bottom of the results of the "how high can you hear" poll, I can't hear lowpass, but I've gathered three samples from my CDs, that have very much treble up to 22 kHz. They're electronic music.
Cosmic Baby - Heaven's tears - Funny how time flies remix.
Air Liquide - Sun Progress
Transwave - Vision quest.
I tried to upload them, but Brinkster crashed, Geocities don't want uploads >5MB, and I don't want to use the bandwidth of my homepage.
I can mail them to someone for hosting them (4, 1 and 2 MB), if someone is interested in.
Again, I can't hear the 20 kHz tones, but as far as I can tell, the mixes are perfectly clean, and I doubt they're noise or artifacts. They must be part of the music.
Thanks for the thread. I was able to find the neat little tone generator in them:
http://www.marchandelec.com/fg.htm (http://www.marchandelec.com/fg.htm)
At work on a DELL with built in sound and running through HK speakers to my phones. The cutoff is around 15.5KHz.
I did notice something odd in the ff123 sweep. Kind of like another superimposed sweep.
Just looking at the Winamp spectrum analyzer it looked like the sweep was always covering a range of freqs.
Hopefully this tone gen will be less likely to produce harmonics or alaising error with the single pure tone.
Peter
Originally posted by NeoRenegade
I seriously doubt it. Your equipment is probably not all that good and you're just hearing harmonics around 18kHz when the tone is any higher because the equipment can't play any higher frequencies.
Are you sure about yours? Sorry if you are.
I stand corrected. I was playing with the tone generator, and it seemed beyond 15KHz the tone didn't necessarily sound like it was increasing, but it was still outputing all the way, but seemed to be varying.
Crap now I guess I will have to burn some test tracks on a CD and try that. I guess trying to ABX anything over 15KHz is pointless. I don't know if it my computer outputs correctly at that point. I trust the Reciever. Its the Nforce MB that I question. I didn't expect it would do anything to the digital stream. But apparently so.
I get the same from the analog outs on the card as the Denon gives me after a digital out.
I would like it better if it went silent after 15KHz, all those Harmonics pretty much means spdif out is not worth crap on my setup.
Hey maybe I can use lowpass 15. :-)
Peter
I have the same situation. My on-motherboard "sound" chip gives bad aliasing distortion. When I had a different computer with a Sound Blaster AWE32 there was no such thing. Alas, my hearing petered out at somthing like 17k if I remember right.
Unfortunately, I can't decide whether to order a Turtle Beach Santa Cruz or ignore the problem and shop for better speakers for my mini-stereo...
Now I burned a CD with with most of the sample directory:
http://lame.sourceforge.net/download/samples/ (http://lame.sourceforge.net/download/samples/)
original wav, followed by APS --lowpass 16 -V3 -b90 then back to wav.
Plus the sweep (but it was limited to some lower frequency on disk).
The only spot where I thought I noticed a difference was on Castanets. And it might not be the low pass that was doing it, but just my solution not using enough bits for the attacks.
The sweep sounded the same lowpassed as original, once I got away from the nasty aliasing distortion of my computer. I think I can peg my cutoff around 15-16KHz.
What kind of sound cards is everyone using that doesnt give them this crappy alaising???
Peter
If you're looking for a new sound card I would suggest looking at either M-Audio Delta Audiophile 2496 or Delta 410 2496. Depends if you also want 5.1 analog output from DVD's.
Both have great sq, check here
http://www.midiman.net/products/m-audio/delta.php (http://www.midiman.net/products/m-audio/delta.php)
You can buy them from Digital Connection's store: https://www.metro-one.com/dc_store/system/P...asp?MFG=M-AUDIO (https://www.metro-one.com/dc_store/system/Product_List.asp?MFG=M-AUDIO)
To make a proper decision I would also look here
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/forumdispla...p?s=&forumid=26 (http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/forumdisplay.php?s=&forumid=26)
Oh, and btw: encode a few cds with a 16khz cut-off then buy one of these and a decent set of headphones and then kick yourself in the nuts, twice, but real hard
Have a look at terratec products too, the EWX and the 6fire are worth. http://www.terratec.com (http://www.terratec.com)
I use a Marian Marc 2 (not Terratec)
Sorry for doubting your hearing, guidryp.
Originally posted by NeoRenegade
Sorry for doubting your hearing, guidryp.
What are you sorry about, you were absolutely correct. My computer does really nasty alaising. After burning to CD, I estimate my cut-off around 15.5 - 16k.
Peter (in Canada too, eh)
Originally posted by guidryp
Thanks for the thread. I was able to find the neat little tone generator in them:
http://www.marchandelec.com/fg.htm (http://www.marchandelec.com/fg.htm)
At work on a DELL with built in sound and running through HK speakers to my phones. The cutoff is around 15.5KHz.
I did notice something odd in the ff123 sweep. Kind of like another superimposed sweep.
Just looking at the Winamp spectrum analyzer it looked like the sweep was always covering a range of freqs.
Hopefully this tone gen will be less likely to produce harmonics or alaising error with the single pure tone.
Peter
Check the "How high can you hear" thread on this board..
This came up, and apparently you can get soundcard generated aliasing on very high freqencies, that's probably what your hearing. Possibly the sound program ff123 used might have generated some distortion as well..
I used Cool Edit 2000 to make a longer one for more accuracy, and found similar noises, but: 1. Bringing the sound level from 0db to -3db reduced them a lot, 2. Changing from 44.1Khz sample rate to 48Khz made them completely inaudible. This on a SB Audigy card.
If I remember right, you can get a demo version of Cool Edit, crippleware, even if it dosen't save, you could create and play back a tone sweep.
www.syntrillium.com (http://www.syntrillium.com) If you have a need for a sound editor, CD 2000 (the non pro version) is pretty good bang for the buck, and you can buy "addon" packs for more features as you need them.
Originally posted by JonPike
Check the "How high can you hear" thread on this board..
This came up, and apparently you can get soundcard generated aliasing on very high freqencies, that's probably what your hearing. Possibly the sound program ff123 used might have generated some distortion as well..
I used Cool Edit 2000 to make a longer one for more accuracy, and found similar noises, but: 1. Bringing the sound level from 0db to -3db reduced them a lot, 2. Changing from 44.1Khz sample rate to 48Khz made them completely inaudible. This on a SB Audigy card.
Yes, that worked perfectly. Apparently my card handles 48KHz natively as well. The alaising is unreal on the ff123 44.1KHz sweep. Converting the sweep to 48 KHz also worked well. But I was able to get a real good idea of my hearing with a slow sweep and a big frequency plot.
I notice the first drop off right around 15KHz and it is silence by 16KHz.
Too bad about the aliasing since, most stuff seems to be in 44KHz.
Peter
Originally posted by tubenut
Unfortunately, I can't decide whether to order a Turtle Beach Santa Cruz or ignore the problem and shop for better speakers for my mini-stereo...
Think twice about the Santa Cruz. The drivers are the most unstable I've ever seen for a sound card... sound quality is good, but the drivers need work IMHO. The 'control panel' will crash Windows if you change settings while sound is playing. I bought the card yesterday, and am probably going to return it tomorrow.
There are some reviews on the Web pointing this out, try searching Google for "Turtle Beach Santa Cruz Review" (no quotes).
Originally posted by fewtch
Think twice about the Santa Cruz. The drivers are the most unstable I've ever seen for a sound card... sound quality is good, but the drivers need work IMHO. The 'control panel' will crash Windows if you change settings while sound is playing. I bought the card yesterday, and am probably going to return it tomorrow.
There are some reviews on the Web pointing this out, try searching Google for "Turtle Beach Santa Cruz Review" (no quotes).
Hmm, I change the settings on my Santa Cruz all the time while sound is playing and Windows doesn't crash. I'm using Win2K SP2.
Originally posted by fewtch
Think twice about the Santa Cruz. The drivers are the most unstable I've ever seen for a sound card... sound quality is good, but the drivers need work IMHO. The 'control panel' will crash Windows if you change settings while sound is playing.
I just installed mine about 30 minutes ago. I'm running Windows XP, using the 4142 build drivers, dated Jan. 10 2002, WHQL certified (from the Turtle Beach website). No crashes yet! (although for some reason, the pressed CD that came with the card would read _very_ slowly on my newly purchased Pioneer DVD-116, making it unusable). I fiddled with all of the control panel settings, and Windows had no problems.
It sounds different from the SB Live I had in there before... Is it better? Hard to say, it could just be louder/different EQ, but I'm enjoying it, and most importantly, resizing windows doesn't cause it to skip!
I'm going to test it myself sometime next week, but maybe someone already knows the answer to this: does the Santa Cruz have the same high-frequency aliasing problems as the SB Live when resampling 44.1khz audio?
does the Santa Cruz have the same high-frequency aliasing problems as the SB Live when resampling 44.1khz audio?
Being based on an AC97 codec, which resamples everything to 48 khz, yes, there is some aliasing, but in the case of Santa Cruz the algorithms are much better. Of course, M-Audio Delta is much better than Santa Cruz
Check here:
http://www.pcavtech.com/soundcards/compare/index.htm (http://www.pcavtech.com/soundcards/compare/index.htm)
Also:
Santa Cruz:
http://www.io.com/~kazushi/audiocard/santacruz/ (http://www.io.com/~kazushi/audiocard/santacruz/)
Audiophile:
http://www.io.com/~kazushi/audiocard/audiophile/ (http://www.io.com/~kazushi/audiocard/audiophile/)
Live!:
http://www.io.com/~kazushi/audiocard/sblive/ (http://www.io.com/~kazushi/audiocard/sblive/)
Thanks for the links lucpes. Finally a test of SB Live! using 48kHz and rear output. I'd like to see similar test of Audigy, do you know any?
Use this cool program to test your soundcard:
http://people.freenet.de/l2001/scan.zip (http://people.freenet.de/l2001/scan.zip)
Sound Card Analyzer
Version 2.0
2001
Author: Alexey Lukin
This program performs various tests of electroacoustical performance of sound
cards and other real-time audio devices. Testing is accomplished by playing the test sig-nals
and recording them after they pass through the testing chain. Because of this, your
sound card must allow full-duplex operation (see “Full-duplex operation”).
In the simplest case the testing chain includes the DAC of your sound card, line
or speakers output, line input, and ADC. In order to test some other devices you must
connect them between the output and the input of your sound card. It is assumed that
you have a high quality sound card, because otherwise poor performance of the sound
card will mask the performance of the external device.
You can use external A/D and D/A converters or digital inputs and outputs of
your sound card.
System requirements: CPU: Pentium or higher, operating system: Windows
95/98/2000.
Things U can test: Frequency response test, Interference and noise level test, Dynamic range test, Total harmonic distortion test, Stereo channels crosstalk test
for more reviews I would go here:
http://www.digit-life.com/hardware/sound.html (http://www.digit-life.com/hardware/sound.html)
the only hardware-oriented site to do good reviews for sound stuff.
Audigy review: http://www.digit-life.com/articles/audigyp...umex/index.html (http://www.digit-life.com/articles/audigyplatinumex/index.html)
edit: http://www.kxproject.com (http://www.kxproject.com) for 3rd party Live & Audigy drivers... try 'em out and see what you think...
AC97 Mixer from http://www.upsystems.com.ua/support/alexmina/ (http://www.upsystems.com.ua/support/alexmina/) is a nice program for those who like to tweak stuff
Thanks for the links Lucpes and Deranger.
I downloaded Sound Card Analyzer and carried the tests on my Audigy with kX project drivers and the results are almost identical to those on digit-life's review.
I'm suprised that I got similar results even though I used really long cable between line-out and line-in and didn't have high quality reference card to sample output. Only result that differed more from their results was Stereo crosstalk: digit-life measured -89.7 dB, my result was -96.2 dB.
Update:
I run the test with supposedly bad front out. 44.1 kHz mode was similar to 44.1 kHz using rear outputs, but 48 kHz was way better than in digit-life's test.
Frequency response: -0.56, +0.07 dB (dl: -2.55, +0.01)
Interference and noise: -94.2 dB (dl: -91.1)
Dynamic range: -87.4 dB (dl: 88.3)
THD + noise: 0.009 % (dl: 0.127)
Stereo crosstalk: -97.0 dB (dl: -64.6)
Is the program reliable, or are kX drivers really so superior to Creative's drivers?
Originally posted by Case
are kX drivers really so superior to Creative's drivers?
I tried using kX drivers here, and gave up. Among the issues, I couldn't use the wave out volume control. It didn't work.
Regards;
Roberto.
Do the reviews at www.pcavtech.com (http://www.pcavtech.com) mean anything? They have the Santa Cruz just below "Gold" status...
You can get an updated version of the Sound Card Analyzer at:
http://audio.rightmark.org (http://audio.rightmark.org)
The new name of the program is RightMark Audio Analyzer, and I think it is quite reliable.
And about www.pcavtech.com (http://www.pcavtech.com) , yes, their analysis are reliable too.
I've analyzed my SC with the RightMark Audio Analyzer and got better results than the ones posted at digit-life. They seem more like the results at pcavtech.
The Santa Cruz is one of the best consumer cards when referring to audio quality, better than the Live!s, and according to experts, as good or slightly better than the Audigy (if we talk exclusively about audio quality, not EAX or gaming, etc).
If you want something better you have to go for a semi-pro card like Terratec EWX 2496 or Midiman Audiophile.
Originally posted by KikeG
You can get an updated version of the Sound Card Analyzer at:
http://audio.rightmark.org (http://audio.rightmark.org)
Thanks for the link KikeG.
RMAA seems to give a bit better results than Sound Card Analyzer, hopefully more thruthful.
If you want something better you have to go for a semi-pro card like Terratec EWX 2496 or Midiman Audiophile.
Even with this poor quality cable I use RMAA shows my card to be very good/excellent, and I have no complaints so I'll stick to this.
Originally posted by SometimesWarrior
I just installed mine about 30 minutes ago. I'm running Windows XP, using the 4142 build drivers, dated Jan. 10 2002, WHQL certified (from the Turtle Beach website). No crashes yet!
OK... it must be those crappy VxD drivers, Turtle Beach hasn't seen fit to update Win98SE (and previous) since 01/2001, and the drivers are apparently incompatible with DirectX 8.1.
Well, if they want to alienate the large installed base still using Win98SE (and even Win95) that's their problem, I suppose. I returned my Santa Cruz card to the store. I'll wait until I can afford a 'semi-pro' audio card (maybe the M-Audio 24/96), or just run with the pack forever... no big deal.
Tubenot,
Alas, my hearing petered out at somthing like 17k if I remember right.
My cutoff seemed to be at 17.2 or 17.3 from the test found on ff123's webpage. I've found similar results on several people at work. All of them couldn't hear past 17khz or 16khz. I was very amazed at how universal a 17khz cutoff is in the average person. I'd be willing to bet that it's rather rare for someone to hear at or above 18khz.
mp3