Decrypted my results. Somehow I cannot find my result for sample05 at http://www.rjamorim.com/test/aac128v2/comments/results05/.
Other results are available there.
My result for sample 5 is missing there as well, for some unknown reason. No problem decrypting it locally:
ABC/HR for Java Version 0.4b3 SE, 20 Februar 2004
Testname: Hongroise listening test
Tester: Continuum
1L = Sample05\Hongroise_3.wav
2R = Sample05\Hongroise_2.wav
3L = Sample05\Hongroise_5.wav
4R = Sample05\Hongroise_4.wav
5L = Sample05\Hongroise_1.wav
---------------------------------------
General Comments:
---------------------------------------
1L File: Sample05\Hongroise_3.wav
1L Rating: 3.0
1L Comment: pre-echo? smeared at 10.6
---------------------------------------
2R File: Sample05\Hongroise_2.wav
2R Rating: 4.5
2R Comment: ABC-HR click moved (start pos 9.03)
little problem at sec 15
---------------------------------------
3L File: Sample05\Hongroise_5.wav
3L Rating: 2.0
3L Comment: severly smeared at ~10.6
---------------------------------------
4R File: Sample05\Hongroise_4.wav
4R Rating: 4.8
4R Comment: very little pre-echo at sec 22-23
---------------------------------------
5L File: Sample05\Hongroise_1.wav
5L Rating: 2.5
5L Comment: sec 15
---------------------------------------
ABX Results:
Original vs Sample05\Hongroise_2.wav
1 out of 1, pval = 0.5
Original vs Sample05\Hongroise_1.wav
5 out of 5, pval = 0.031
I find this sample particulary interesting. All codecs had problems at different sections. And looking at the bitrate table,
Nero Real Faac Comp! iTunes
Hongroise 148 128 105 123 128
I am quite shocked by Nero's performance. Faac on the other hand got a respectable rating, considering its low bitrate.