Skip to main content


Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: EAC3 vs AAC  (Read 1811 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


HELLO guys
i wonder which audio codec is better eac3 or aac in the same bitrate for stereo audio ?

Re: EAC3 vs AAC

Reply #1
I have no idea. Is there anything which can encode to EAC3?

Also which bit rates is EAC3 meant for, is it even near competitive at < 128 kbps?

Re: EAC3 vs AAC

Reply #2
EAC3 to AC3 is the same as AAC to HE-AAC.

If  an original source is EAC3 it's recommended to not transcode from lossy to lossy (from EAC3 to AAC).
If  an original source  is lossless then go with AAC(medium and high bitrates) or HE-AAC (less than ~180-200 kbps for 5.1) for better quality.

Re: EAC3 vs AAC

Reply #3
E-AC-3 is only a slight improvement over conventional AC-3, and still carries an overhead of loudness, compression and checksum data. It requires a relatively high bitrate. AAC is more efficient and compatible on the personal computer. Maybe that is not true on h/w receivers.