Thanks WilB for the update, much appreciated!
Yes, I also thought about the shortness or non existing bio to be the reason but v0.72 gave top tags, top albums, similar artist results even if there was no bio present.
I also thought low listener/scrobble count would be the issue but couldn't find much consistency in that either.
Looking forward to your next release.
Thank you for your reply. Sorry in case I have duplicated another post (the title suggested it was only about buffer issues).
I've downloaded and run LatencyMon. Here is a screen capture, and below a summary of the full report. If possible I'd rather try simple measures first, before more "expert" operations like BIOS update...Thank you for those who would give an advice.
OS version: Windows 7 Service Pack 1, 6.1, build: 7601 (x86)
Hardware: Vostro 3700, Dell Inc., 07VWR8
CPU: GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 430 @ 2.27GHz
Logical processors: 4
Processor groups: 1
RAM: 3062 MB total
Reported CPU speed: 2260 MHz
Highest measured interrupt to process latency (µs): 54510,712921
Average measured interrupt to process latency (µs): 21,87530
Highest measured interrupt to DPC latency (µs): 1705,625212
Average measured interrupt to DPC latency (µs): 2,181063
Highest ISR routine execution time (µs): 318,721239
Driver with highest ISR routine execution time: dxgkrnl.sys - DirectX Graphics Kernel, Microsoft Corporation
Highest reported total ISR routine time (%): 0,028285
Driver with highest ISR total time: dxgkrnl.sys - DirectX Graphics Kernel, Microsoft Corporation
Total time spent in ISRs (%) 0,052067
ISR count (execution time <250 µs): 9169
ISR count (execution time 250-500 µs): 0
ISR count (execution time 500-999 µs): 1
ISR count (execution time 1000-1999 µs): 0
ISR count (execution time 2000-3999 µs): 0
ISR count (execution time >=4000 µs): 0
Highest DPC routine execution time (µs): 3119,463274
Driver with highest DPC routine execution time: nvlddmkm.sys - NVIDIA Windows Kernel Mode Driver, Version 327.02 , NVIDIA Corporation
Highest reported total DPC routine time (%): 0,169990
Driver with highest DPC total execution time: nvlddmkm.sys - NVIDIA Windows Kernel Mode Driver, Version 327.02 , NVIDIA Corporation
Total time spent in DPCs (%) 0,288090
DPC count (execution time <250 µs): 96315
DPC count (execution time 250-500 µs): 0
DPC count (execution time 500-999 µs): 228
DPC count (execution time 1000-1999 µs): 8
DPC count (execution time 2000-3999 µs): 440
DPC count (execution time >=4000 µs): 0
Process with highest pagefault count: latmon.exe
Total number of hard pagefaults 19
Hard pagefault count of hardest hit process: 15
Highest hard pagefault resolution time (µs): 32232,216372
Total time spent in hard pagefaults (%): 0,029413
Number of processes hit: 4
PER CPU DATA
CPU 0 Interrupt cycle time (s): 1,453145
CPU 0 ISR highest execution time (µs): 203,729204
CPU 0 ISR total execution time (s): 0,092455
CPU 0 ISR count: 2350
CPU 0 DPC highest execution time (µs): 2892,576106
CPU 0 DPC total execution time (s): 0,735371
CPU 0 DPC count: 73359
CPU 1 Interrupt cycle time (s): 0,916358
CPU 1 ISR highest execution time (µs): 194,365487
CPU 1 ISR total execution time (s): 0,079806
CPU 1 ISR count: 2259
CPU 1 DPC highest execution time (µs): 2673,711504
CPU 1 DPC total execution time (s): 0,396519
CPU 1 DPC count: 11697
CPU 2 Interrupt cycle time (s): 0,892912
CPU 2 ISR highest execution time (µs): 318,721239
CPU 2 ISR total execution time (s): 0,090457
CPU 2 ISR count: 2230
CPU 2 DPC highest execution time (µs): 3119,463274
CPU 2 DPC total execution time (s): 0,418236
CPU 2 DPC count: 5373
CPU 3 Interrupt cycle time (s): 0,786721
CPU 3 ISR highest execution time (µs): 248,922124
CPU 3 ISR total execution time (s): 0,086456
CPU 3 ISR count: 2331
CPU 3 DPC highest execution time (µs): 2898,234956
CPU 3 DPC total execution time (s): 0,381862
CPU 3 DPC count: 6562
@jazzthieve The examples you quoted either don't have or have a very short actual biography. I had changed the detector for whether a biography existed & essentially if it didn't exist or was short, i.e. likely to be "We don't have a wiki here yet...", or something similar, it was rejected and none of the other extra info saved either.
Anyway I have changed it to a better detector, so very short bios should now be found, and it will also now include the extra info even if there is no actual biography. That will be in the next release. I probably need to test it further though...
@tr0ner. Are "Deluxe Edition", "Limited Edition" etc. part of your tags? The script already does some clean up of album names. I could add these to the list of terms that get stripped, so it always searches for the "core" name, which is more likely to find a cover. If there are any other terms worth including let me know.
I get this ongoing error message shown below when I attempt to open a FLAC File in foobar2000; any possible fixes?
Unable to open item for playback (Error parsing cuesheet: invalid TITLE syntax (line 95)):
"D:\Johnson\1999 – All The Music\Johnson - All The Music.cue"
Below is part of the cue file:
REM GENRE Vocal
REM DATE 1999
REM DISCID 16100D12
REM COMMENT "ExactAudioCopy v0.99pb5"
TITLE " All The Music "
FILE "Johnson - All The Music.wav" WAVE
TRACK 01 AUDIO
TITLE "All The Music"
INDEX 01 00:00:00
Below is Line 95 (Title Syntax Error):
TRACK 19 AUDIO
TITLE "Love Me More (Peter Parker. Mix)" (THIS IS LINE 95)
INDEX 00 68:58:21
INDEX 01 68:59:16
Thank you again for creating this!!
It finds and downloads most covers automatically and works like a charm.
One idea: some albums are tagged with additional info like "Deluxe Edition", "Limited Edition" etc. and the scipt does not find the cover because of that.
Maybe you could add an option in the right click menu to manually change the search term if there is no cover found?
Last post by sundance -
The Yamaha WXC-50 (did you mean that one? Couldn't find a WCX-60)) looks very promising; it even has BlueTooth. I'm going to download a detailed spec and user manual, if I can find one.
And I could live w/o ChromeCast, if everything else worked fine - adding a ChromeCast-Audio to AUX in doesn't hurt much (add some 39€ and having an extra device, though). Another con is (imho) missing support for AppleMusic.
Does anything mentioned in this thread ring a bell? https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,113843/topicseen.html
Have you recently had a driver update or something?
Last post by q-stankovic -
@Arnold B. Krueger
The Problem with android driven boxes is that you cannot realize air-play-functionality in a proper way. And since we have some apple devices that is a important function. Furthermore i need the streaming device as expansion of my hifi-system - means: without a tv as uncomfortable medium.
@eldarien & @sundance
So far the best of my Research: