Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Recent Posts
1
FLAC / Re: FLAC v1.3.3
Last post by sheik124 -
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

I'm curious about the file size differences I see vs. 1.3.2 and also when comparing john33's build with either Griever's or Ozz's. Also curious why john33 rolled back to the commit he did. I probably should've tried to match the three builds by commit but I could only find ce6dd6b on rarewares and 7a35c528 looks like the last one Griever posted...can the compiler used actually make a difference in the output file size? To be clear, this has nothing to do with the "bloat" bug mentioned in this topic.

Griever's is fastest on my old machine by a decent enough amount for hi-res files that I'll probably stick with it. I saw it hit the mid 70x range in fb2k while the other two were high 60s, very scientific! john33's build seems to make 96/24 files that are ~3 KB larger than the other two for whatever reason. Sometimes the 1.3.3 builds are collectively larger than 1.3.2 for 96/24, and sometimes they're smaller. All three builds are faster than 1.3.2. I tested using the same rip of the same track from that post I made here 14 years ago, I also tried the 2015 96/24 release, and another Hi-Res track. Obviously can't[1]share any of the copyrighted test files themselves.

There was only a <1 KB difference between any of the builds or 1.3.2 for 44/16, using Muse's "Take a Bow" from that old post. Entirely inconsequential unless I'm right at the boundary between requiring an extra NTFS cluster. Oh no...31.3 MB (32,821,248 bytes) "on disk" for all of the above in any case, so it's not going to be noticeable. No, I am not going to check my library for FLAC files that are "some multiple of 4 KB minus <1 KB" in size, and I'm pretty sure the drive on my NAS with most of the music on it has 64KB blocks either way, so even the 96/24 differences aren't really differences. Somewhat comically, at least for these three files, the 1.3.2 files as a whole win...

Test File // VersionGriever 7a35c528Ozz 313ab58john33 ce6dd6b1.3.2
01. Take a Bow.flac 96/24107 MB (112 904 836 bytes)107 MB (112 904 853 bytes)107 MB (112 907 505 bytes)107 MB (112 910 775 bytes)
01 Take A Bow.flac 44/16 CD31.2 MB (32 819 379 bytes)31.2 MB (32 819 370 bytes)31.2 MB (32 819 357 bytes)31.2 MB (32 819 331 bytes)
01. One Last Kiss 96/2483.5 MB (87 594 621 bytes)83.5 MB (87 594 348 bytes)83.5 MB (87 597 426 bytes)83.5 MB (87 581 227 bytes)
Total222.5 MB (233 318 836 bytes)222.5 MB (233 318 571 bytes)222.5 MB (233 324 288 bytes)222.5 MB (233 311 333 bytes)
Diff+7,503 bytes+7,238 bytes+12,955 bytes0
Build Namemingw-w64-x86_64-flac-git-1.3.3.r3909.7a35c528FLAC_1.3.3_313ab58-Ozzflac-v1.3.3.git-ce6dd6b-x64flac-1.3.2-win
realized this explorer screenshot was pointless after checking the exact file sizes and adding them as a table courtesy of a very convenient BBCode table generator[2]
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
The only time I re-encode anything these days anyways is when certain Hi-Res download sites give you bizarre, larger than PCM padded? 4616 kbps 96/24 FLAC files for whatever reason. I don't think this is the bloat bug either, the entire album was like this, as if it was just PCM with ogg headers. "Bigger is better." Those get beat with the Level 8 stick out of spite. Apologies for not comparing all of them more, editing the hardlink to flac.exe is a pain in the butt.

Beautiful World [1.3.1 - Source]180 MB (189 548 998 bytes)
Beautiful World [PCM[3]]175 MB (183 586 602 bytes)
Beautiful World [1.3.2 Level 8]116 MB (122 368 039 bytes)
Beautiful World [Griever Level 8]116 MB (122 369 621 bytes)
Beautiful World [Griever Level 0]132 MB (138 737 844 bytes)

Thank you to all three of you for compiling these BTW!
publicly
still tagged with album art and everything too...
2
General Audio / Re: WMP Tag Plus - MPEG4, Vorbis and FLAC metadata support for WMP
Last post by Kusaywa -
I previously reported that WMP seemed to be reading FLAC tags correctly... I spoke too soon. All of a sudden, WMP would read random FLAC tags as Unknown Artist. I am back to using WMP Tag Plus! Can say that it resolved my problem in Windows 10 21H1 and Windows 11. Thanks Tim De Baets for your continued support.
5
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: JScript Panel
Last post by DVS -
Thanks, They are both useful.
By the way, I noticed that the tagged track via Sync PlayCount Last.FM, is not displayed via Last.Fm Lover. In reverse order, it works fine.
10
MP3 / Re: MP3 file encoded by Google
Last post by U2021 -
How did you find out?
Well, it's not that hard to find out: MP3 is dead & LAME is the only MP3 encoder available.
SimplePortal 1.0.0 RC1 © 2008-2021