Apart from the cost of licensing etc, are there many reasons NOT to use mp3pro for low bitrate encodes?
PS, also has anyone fixed the mp3pro config in foobar yet?
I can encode mp3pro only with 22khz. Thats very negative.
And I think that the resulting mp3 files are not gapless.
When I want low bitrates, I use ogg vorbis or nero he-aac.
Im toying with nero-aac but doesnt the PNS help it? I can never get that working
I can encode mp3pro only with 22khz. Thats very negative.
And I think that the resulting mp3 files are not gapless.
When I want low bitrates, I use ogg vorbis or nero he-aac.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=246887"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Encoding yes, but playback is 44.1 Khz (SBR tool). Like HE-AAC (most often).
Apart from the cost of licensing etc, are there many reasons NOT to use mp3pro for low bitrate encodes?
...
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a] (http://index.php?act=findpost&pid=246880")
Accodring to this [a href="http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?act=ST&f=1&t=28353&hl=&view=findpost&p=245974]thread about low bitrate files[/url] the support of MP3pro (portable devices, software players, operation systems) still must be very low.
yeah, but all the small mp3pro files that i want to create would be stored on my pc so it really wouldnt matter. I like the SBR in mp3pro, but i can never get that working in aac
yeah, but all the small mp3pro files that i want to create would be stored on my pc so it really wouldnt matter. I like the SBR in mp3pro, but i can never get that working in aac
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a] (http://index.php?act=findpost&pid=246906")
Indeed SBR and the more advanced low-bitrate features of Aac are amayzing methods how the ears get tricked out.
You should check the [a href="http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?act=SF&s=&f=54]AAC forum[/url] for specific help. The users there surely will be able to say if your encoder can create HE-Aac files (containing/using SBR).