Skip to main content


Please be aware that much of the software linked to or mentioned on this forum is niche and therefore infrequently downloaded. Lots of anti-virus scanners and so-called malware detectors like to flag infrequently downloaded software as bad until it is either downloaded enough times, or its developer actually bothers with getting each individual release allow listed by every single AV vendor. You can do many people a great favor when encountering such a "problem" example by submitting them to your AV vendor for examination. For almost everything on this forum, it is a false positive.
Topic: Should I use "qaac" instead of "fdk" because my audio source is 24 bit? (Read 1195 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Should I use "qaac" instead of "fdk" because my audio source is 24 bit?

"qaac" reportedly uses 32 bit float internally where as "fdk" uses only 16 bit integer.

Now lets put aside the fact that one of them might be more efficient than the other. So when using a 24 bit source is there a reason to use "qaac" instead of "fdk"?

Is doing 24 bit -> 16 bit as much of a sin as transcoding?

Re: Should I use "qaac" instead of "fdk" because my audio source is 24 bit?

Reply #1
Answer is it doesn't matter:

24/192 Music Downloads...and why they make no sense

24 bit vs 16 bit: Nobody can hear any difference in the "music". 24 bit is for audio engineering and the like. There was never produced a recording that demanded 24 bit for faithful reproduction.

If you are already using qaac, fine. The 24 bit audio is internally changed to 32 bit float so no loss there. Just stay with it.

If you are already using fdk, 24 bit audio will be converted to 16 bit and you will never notice it.  Just stay with it.

SimplePortal 1.0.0 RC1 © 2008-2021