Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Why no Vorbis 2-pass? (Read 26981 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Why no Vorbis 2-pass?

Reply #50
2pass encoding is only usefull to speed up the process of getting the most quality out of a given file size (I say 'speed up' because trial & error is the alternative method).

I have yet to see any circumstance where 2pass audio encoding is more usefull than 1pass vbr 
Does anybody know of any at all?

For video encoding 2pass is very usefull, since the trial & error method is extremely time consuming.
Vorbis-q0-lowpass99
lame3.93.1-q5-V9-k-nspsytune

Why no Vorbis 2-pass?

Reply #51
What about listening tests where a specific average bitrate for the collection of samples may be desired?
Veni Vidi Vorbis.

 

Why no Vorbis 2-pass?

Reply #52
I have yet to see any circumstance where 2pass audio encoding is more usefull than 1pass vbr 
Does anybody know of any at all?


Rehuff can be used only with a two pass encoding (altought this is not the same two pass of video encoding, this is really a two pass).
More infos on rehuff:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev...ust/018522.html