Skip to main content
Topic: Lame 3.100 has been released (Read 24683 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Lame 3.100 has been released

Reply #100
Looks like Rarewares build is fastest without patches. But the problem is 32bit & 64bit versions don't null and three pops appear in beggining of one of the files (when null compared). I have no idea why if they use same Intel Compiler.
Maybe it should be recompiled again?
What program do you use for this comparison? Those pops are not audible for you?

I've re-compiled and uploaded the lame bundles. The 32 bit version appears unchanged, but there is a difference with the 64 bit version. Personally, I can't hear a difference, but maybe someone can do a more exhaustive check. :)
I have compared 4 files encoded with your 64-bit version compiled in October and in December. Binary comparator in foobar2000 says "no differences found".
BTW, I am converting using foobar2000 converter. Is it in any way important that I am inititating 64-bit LAME encoder from foobar2000 which is 32-bit program?
iRiver H10 20 GB - Rockbox

Re: Lame 3.100 has been released

Reply #101
I've re-compiled and uploaded the lame bundles. The 32 bit version appears unchanged, but there is a difference with the 64 bit version. Personally, I can't hear a difference, but maybe someone can do a more exhaustive check. :)
I have compared 4 files encoded with your 64-bit version compiled in October and in December. Binary comparator in foobar2000 says "no differences found".
BTW, I am converting using foobar2000 converter. Is it in any way important that I am inititating 64-bit LAME encoder from foobar2000 which is 32-bit program?
I didn't expect there to be any difference between the Oct and Dec compiles, I just re-checked the compile options just to be sure that I hadn't missed something the first time round. ;) I also usually convert using Foobar as you specify and, no, that isn't an issue.
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/

Re: Lame 3.100 has been released

Reply #102
I didn't expect there to be any difference between the Oct and Dec compiles, I just re-checked the compile options just to be sure that I hadn't missed something the first time round. ;)
"Slivka" was saying that your "32bit & 64bit versions don't null and three pops appear in beggining of one of the files (when null compared)" so I thought you are recompiling to check if this is eliminated :) Are those "pops" even confirmed? As I understand 32-bit and 64-bit compiled versions can produce slightly different files in encoding, but I don't know what he meant by "three pops in the beginning". Three pops that can be heard or just three bits with different values?
iRiver H10 20 GB - Rockbox

Re: Lame 3.100 has been released

Reply #103
tmkk patch + fastcrc patch + clang 8.0 snapshot (Full LTO) + msvc2010 lib
nothing special, GOGO-no-coda ~256kbps VBR + mp3packer

Re: Lame 3.100 has been released

Reply #104
I may be the sole user of lamedrop (xpd) . . .

+1
You are not alone :)

Me too. LameDropXPd has been my "go-to" Lame frontend for a long time.

New LamedropXPd compiles uploaded with the narrative corrected. :)

Thanks John. And for all the work you do for making our music enjoyment better.

Artie

 
SimplePortal 1.0.0 RC1 © 2008-2018