Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: wav vs. celt 0.11.2 (Read 2866 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

wav vs. celt 0.11.2

Hello, Jean-Marc Valin

I Make accurate ABX with Audacity
my result is, I audible the highs are smearing, Compare it self!
Using audioequipments are RME Fireface 800 and audio-technica ATH40fs headphones

Test sample


wav vs. celt 0.11.2

Reply #1
64kbps is a low bitrate.


(And I will not even ask how can one do an ABX test in Audacity...)

wav vs. celt 0.11.2

Reply #2
2304p,

Have You done any resampling in the middle of or after the conversion?. There is a symptom of noise shaping in your celt decoded file.
Also not sure if 0.11.2 will be decodable in future. It will be more safe to wait for final specs of Opus.

0.11.2 works more optimally at  48 kHz.
One should expect acceptable quality at 64 kbps but transparency can be achieved at higher bitrates.

 
SimplePortal 1.0.0 RC1 © 2008-2021