Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: So what instruments are hard to encode *usually*? (Read 3854 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

So what instruments are hard to encode *usually*?

So what instruments are hard to encode *usually*? I know people have talked about Harpsichord, but is there any other hard-to-encode things? And what instruments are easy to encode?

So what instruments are hard to encode *usually*?

Reply #1
Rare artificial signals for all encoders. For MP3 ; precussion, keys  - pre echo. Ringing, dropouts with quite music - vocals, guitars.
wavpack hybrid 256k -hx4

So what instruments are hard to encode *usually*?

Reply #2
In classical, I find strings are always a tricky area. They're usually where I notice a poor encode first.

Cymbals always highlight the failings of less-than-great MP3 encodes, they sound artificially jangly on the very high end.

The lead singer from the Stereophonics, Kelly Jones, has an amazingly gruff, husky voice which used to sound AWFUL when I first encoded one of their albums - this was a good eight or nine years ago AT LEAST, I was using the CannaMP3 Encoder (oneclick solution) with, I think, the Xing MPEG encoder! Of course, Lame handles it just fine now, and has done for several years - but if you've got a low-bitrate encode, his voice is an excellent indicator of whether the quality is going to be good or not, regardless of the format. (listen to "Bartender And The Thief" from their album 'Performance And Cocktails').
Don't forget International Talk Like A Pirate Day! September the 19th!

 
SimplePortal 1.0.0 RC1 © 2008-2021