Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Encoding Times for various CPU (Read 3885 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Encoding Times for various CPU

Hey Guys I was wondering at what x u guys encode -preset standard mp3s at.  At home on my mom's computer its a p3 500 & its about 1x.  which really sucks. On my own computer, a 1.33GhZ AMD, its about 3x.

I was wondering about various other cpus & their encodeing times. Any possible information will be greatly appriacited for I am plannin to purchase another computer either for myself (if its faster) or for my mom.

Thanks

edit: Thanks for reminding me... yea i use LAME 3.90.2ICL for both

Encoding Times for various CPU

Reply #1
4 - 4,5x on Athlon 1700XP+ with Lame 3.90.2 ICL (report the lame version too for comparisions (is that spelled right?) )


0,8-0,7 on my old PII 333Mhz with Lame 3.90.2 ICL
This is your life and it's ending one minute at a time!

Encoding Times for various CPU

Reply #2
4.5-5.5x depending on the song on my p4 2.12 ghz on a sis 645 mainboard and ddr2100 ram.  using lame 3.90.2 and aps.  usually get double that speed with mpc though.

Encoding Times for various CPU

Reply #3
3.91, --alt preset standard,

Y2K, VIA266A/DDR256MB, AthlonXP 1700+,

4X.

3.90.2=4.1x.

Encoding Times for various CPU

Reply #4
Quote
3.90.2, --alt preset standard,

Y2K, VIA266A/DDR256MB, AthlonXP 1700+,

7X.

Are you sure? 7x? Isn't --alt-preset fast?
or your song was too easy to encode?
My processor is the same as your and how do you encode twice as fast as mine!?
This is your life and it's ending one minute at a time!

Encoding Times for various CPU

Reply #5
Sorry, I remembered Razerlame telling me something about 7x when I used mp3  .

Encoding Times for various CPU

Reply #6
on p3/800 around 2x. (3.90.2 --alt-preset standard)
PANIC: CPU 1: Cache Error (unrecoverable - dcache data) Eframe = 0x90000000208cf3b8
NOTICE - cpu 0 didn't dump TLB, may be hung

Encoding Times for various CPU

Reply #7
Dell Inspiron 4150
P4-M 1.8Ghz
512MB
WinXP Pro


Lame 3.93            --preset standard:      4.75x
Lame 3.90.2-ICL  --alt-preset standard:  4.67x

Not to bad for a laptop? 

Encoding Times for various CPU

Reply #8
System: Dell Dimension XPS R400
Processor/Speed: Intel Pentium 2 w/MMX @ 400Mhz
RAM: 384MB
OS: Microsoft Windows 98 (OEM), 4.10.98

Compile: Lame 3.90.2 (Dibrom)
Speed (Approximate): 1.1x to 1.5x
Switch: --alt-preset standard

Compile: Lame 3.92 (Mitiok)
Speed (Approximate): .7x to .9x
Switch: --alt-preset standard

Edit: Forgot to list RAM.

Encoding Times for various CPU

Reply #9
CPU - AthlonXP 1900
RAM - 512Mb PC2700
MB  - KT333
OS  - Win2k

Lame 3.92 --preset standard: 4.9 - 5.1x

Is lame 3.93 the latest.  can anyone please supply a link so I can download the latest version!

Encoding Times for various CPU

Reply #10
Quote
Is lame 3.93 the latest.  can anyone please supply a link so I can download the latest version!

3.93.1 is:

http://mitiok.free.fr/

 

Encoding Times for various CPU

Reply #11
Lame 3.93.1 --preset standard: 6.06- 6.13x

  what an improvement!  hope the audio quality improves to

Thanks for the link Andavari