Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: foo_enhanced_spectrum_analyzer (Read 80750 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: foo_enhanced_spectrum_analyzer

Reply #200 –
Quote from: regor on
@TF3RDL could you stop endlessly spamming the thread?
Yes to not clutter up this thread as I've only posted FRs (not really exclusively as I've already raised some things that aren't working as expected like the window function is still Hann even if I switched the windowing function to others like none (rectangular), and the "RMS" spectrum is actually calculated in logarithmic amplitude scale instead of linear or squared domain and have weird stuff when it goes above 0dB line)
Quote from: regor on
if you want to create a new thread with your suggestions, fine.
Done and I can't wait to see my FRs being moved into a new thread "dedicated" for FRs for this component, as I've suggested mods to migrate most of it into an aforementioned new thread

Re: foo_enhanced_spectrum_analyzer

Reply #201 –
another nitpick: The option "1024" in the FFT size parameter is just 2048 samples FFT, same as "2048" option and also when you set as "2048" on the FFT size parameter, it goes to "1024" since the first two are exactly the same

Re: foo_enhanced_spectrum_analyzer

Reply #202 –
Is there a way to increase the frequency range?
Right now it cuts off at a bit over 20KHz, and I haven't found any setting in the options to change this.

Re: foo_enhanced_spectrum_analyzer

Reply #203 –
Quote from: Kronzky on
Is there a way to increase the frequency range?
Right now it cuts off at a bit over 20KHz, and I haven't found any setting in the options to change this.

Wait and see when @Crossover finally releases version 2.x.x.x of this component, hopefully with an option to automatically set max frequency range to the Nyquist frequency of the source audio signal (actually after all of DSP processing effects since there are resamplers that changes the sample rate)

Meanwhile, you can play around with my own audio spectrum analyzers like this one

BTW, the max frequency range of this audio spectrum component is actually somewhere around 24kHz

Re: foo_enhanced_spectrum_analyzer

Reply #204 –
Looks like this one has everything I'm looking for (in case someone else is wondering):


It seem TF3RDL has scared off the original developer so much that we'll have to look elsewhere now...

Re: foo_enhanced_spectrum_analyzer

Reply #205 –
Quote from: Kronzky on
It seem TF3RDL has scared off the original developer so much that we'll have to look elsewhere now...
Hence, the reason why I've made a separate thread dedicated for feature requests for this component

I hope @Crossover doing well without any adverse mental health effects coming from my doings (e.g. a fanon wiki page about a supposed future version of this) that supposedly "scared" him off

Re: foo_enhanced_spectrum_analyzer

Reply #206 –
Making a separate feature request thread (with dozens of items) is as much of a "harassment" as is hijacking his release thread.
In many places you'd be banned for kind of behavior.

I've been doing freeware development myself for many years, so I know how it feels from the other side, and having people bombard you with requests is the most surefire way of getting me to quit a project. Heck, I'd even drop a *paying* client if he would behave like that (as that's the kind of customer who would never be satisfied, no matter the end-product).
But I see you're already doing the same on the other release I've linked to above, where 3 of the 4 open issues are posts by you.
My suggestion, if you want others to work for you for free: Back Off...

Re: foo_enhanced_spectrum_analyzer

Reply #207 –
Quote from: Kronzky on
Making a separate feature request thread (with dozens of items) is as much of a "harassment" as is hijacking his release thread.
I've never thought of making a separate thread related to this, dedicated for my doings might "scared" him off just as equally as posting a load of FRs in the main thread but I'm curious about why would they?

On the flipside, kamen in MusicBee forums added (or more accurately, reimplemented) some of my requested stuffs (Mid/Side mode, IIR filter bank) into his MB plugin named "CoolEdit Nostalgia" visualizer, and yet I didn't made the dedicated FR thread for his MB plugin on that forum nor a Fanon Wiki page about it

Quote from: Kronzky on
In many places you'd be banned for kind of behavior.
I've already expected that some users I've DMing to will eventually get me blocked from DMing to them if they got annoyed by my doings on something like Discord and even X (formerly Twitter) so yes, that could happen so I have to avoid "bombarding" someone on Discord (though it also applies to anything else including Twitter/X) if I don't want being blocked from DMing someone else

BTW, I haven't used X/Twitter (besides reading some posts occasionally) in my entire life

Quote from: Kronzky on
I've been doing freeware development myself for many years, so I know how it feels from the other side, and having people bombard you with requests is the most surefire way of getting me to quit a project. Heck, I'd even drop a *paying* client if he would behave like that (as that's the kind of customer who would never be satisfied, no matter the end-product).
But I see you're already doing the same on the other release I've linked to above, where 3 of the 4 open issues are posts by you.
But not always, it depends on how I've doing to developers amongst other factors including but not limited to their willingness to handle unrealistic expectations coming from someone else and of course, how they react to a fanon wiki page like this one detailing a future version of existing things with new features

Quote from: Kronzky on
My suggestion, if you want others to work for you for free: Back Off...
Good suggestion to reduce if not avoid the likelihood of a developer being "scared off" by me requesting needed features in a particular way and also directing focus on something else like updating my own CodePen projects with new features and contributing to fanon wikis on FANDOM/Wikia

BTW, with @Crossover being "scared off" and never open-sourced his own fb2k components, I've (and someone else) might never see spectrogram display, alternate transform algorithms, linear and perceptual frequency scales, linear/nth root amplitude scaling, etc. coming in foo_enhanced_spectrum_analyzer, nor Peak/RMS bars, an option to disable graphs and only show Momentary/Short-term/Integrated LUFS and/or Peak/RMS bars, scrolling mode for loudness peakmeter graph, Mid/Side representations, etc. on foo_loudness_peakmeter. Not even new components like vectorscope, which is sorely missing even as third-party components in foobar2000

So let's hope that him being "scared off" is a temporary one and he will eventually return to the forums and updating his own components and even making a new one but only time will tell, so I have to rely on either @pqyt or even @oops

Re: foo_enhanced_spectrum_analyzer

Reply #208 –
This is a very nice component, better than the default spectrum analyser, and I'll definitely be using it!

I have some feedback and a feature request - I'd love to see an option to set the floor of the scale to custom values (for example setting it to -60dB would hide anything below -60dB and expand the rest of the visible scale so that everything between -60dB and -0dB fills the window).

Aside of that, i noticed a typo in the options dialogue window - It says "vertikal", while in english the correct spelling is "vertical".
Random digital audio nerd girl
A potato

Re: foo_enhanced_spectrum_analyzer

Reply #209 –
Quote from: Meowdori on
This is a very nice component, better than the default spectrum analyser, and I'll definitely be using it!
Me too, and also, foo_vis_spectrum_analyzer isn't intended to replace foo_enhanced_spectrum_analyzer

Quote from: Meowdori on
I have some feedback and a feature request - I'd love to see an option to set the floor of the scale to custom values (for example setting it to -60dB would hide anything below -60dB and expand the rest of the visible scale so that everything between -60dB and -0dB fills the window).
This was already showcased by @Crossover in a thread about foo_musical_spectrum component

Only time will tell if version 2.x.x.x of this component will eventually came out

Quote from: Meowdori on
Aside of that, i noticed a typo in the options dialogue window - It says "vertikal", while in english the correct spelling is "vertical".
Idk if @Crossover speaks in non-native English and/or it is based in Germany
 

Re: foo_enhanced_spectrum_analyzer

Reply #210 –
Quote from: Crossover on
Here is a current picture of the component.

What does the word "NORMAL" on top-right corner mean on this screenshot of the upcoming next version of foo_enhanced_spectrum_analyzer component?

And why there isn't infinite decay rate mode, even for "RMS" spectrum?